Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Letters of the week

by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2000
by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2000

Theory is fine, but realism is key

• I read with interest Ralph Tribe’s piece in response to the recent debate
over the value of IPD qualifications (11 January). It seems Ralph has it
absolutely right. I do not wish to rubbish the IPD qualification scheme, but
must point out my own experiences.

I am a licentiate of the institute having gone through the various stages of
"learning" up to and including PQS II Core P&D. I returned to the
scheme to complete my final year, having taken a break, and realised just how
painful the process can be. My method of study was day release.

With five years’ experience in frontline HR in a fast-moving manufacturing
environment, I found the experience of returning to the IPD electives
disappointing. I was learning very little, being subjected to case study after
case study, going back over old ground and having to listen to the best
practice solutions of a predominantly public sector/local authority group of
classmates.

Perceived best practice is sometimes not viable in the world of making money
for shareholders. You can have all the theories in the world but they won’t
make money unless they fit the situation. This realism seemed to be lost on the
group and, to some extent, the lecturer.

After eight weeks it was obvious my time would be better spent making money
for my shareholders, so I left the course.

The previous stages of the syllabus had given me an excellent grounding in
my early HR career and were most valuable.

It seems the IPD is grasping at straws trying to find things to teach in the
final stage of PQS II.

We have a very professional HR department at our organisation which provides
realistic yet innovative solutions to a complex and very large business. I have
learnt a huge amount during my time in HR and am proud to be associated with
the profession but I do feel the reverence with which the IPD is held might be
a bit old school tie if not mason-like.

The other services provided by the institute are useful, therefore I hope
you do not think me hypo-critical if I hang on to my membership and endorse the
IPD as worth its weight in mortar boards.

The moral of the story is, that the theory is fine, but realism and
experience is the key.

Glen Cook

HR Officer

Address the root cause of stress

• Nottingham City Council has made headway in reducing sickness and absenteeism
(January 11). In so doing, it has identified the need for intervention to
combat the root causes.

However, it is difficult to consider the incidence of sickness and
absenteeism in isolation. These issues can be indicative of low performance and
productivity. Many employees remain in work while experiencing the same
problems as those absent.

It is often found by employee assistance programmes that effective
interventions can increase sickness and absenteeism in the short term, as
employees take responsibility for their well-being. In the long term,
interventions must go beyond the individual employee to supporting them in
confronting difficulties.

It is important any interventions employed, while correcting the symptoms of
problems, also pursue and address the stressors.

Dr Angela Hetherington

Clinical director

PPC UK

Time to practise what you preach

• In response to "HR kept off the board as skills gap shows" (18
January), the HR function itself bears the responsibility through an increased
emphasis on a self-contained closed "professionalism" rather than a
broad business approach using specialised HR skills. This starts at the
recruitment stage with entry dominated by social science or specialist HR
qualifications.

How many in the Institute of Personnel and Development welcomed the move to
chartered status as building a stronger professional fence around the function
– perhaps leading to making an IPD qualification legally required for the top
HR posts?

More HR professionals need to either use executive coaches to help them
integrate into the management of the business, or practise what they preach by
actively managing their own careers to include a spell in positions with direct
business responsibilities.

Bill Robbins

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Director, senior executive centre

Drake Beam Morin

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
HR loses direction on its way up
next post
Heading for the 21st Century

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+