Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

National living wageCoronavirusLatest NewsMinimum wage

Delay increase to national living wage, says IFS

by Jo Faragher 26 Mar 2020
by Jo Faragher 26 Mar 2020 Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/PA Images
Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/PA Images

The government should delay next month’s rise in the national living wage in order to protect jobs in the midst of the coronavirus crisis, a think-tank has urged.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies has questioned whether the planned increase in the statutory minimum hourly rate to £8.72 from 1 April “still makes sense”.

Annual wage increase

National living wage survey 2020

“That decision was based on a recommendation made back in October when the labour market looked utterly different,” said Tom Waters, an IFS researcher. “If the absolute focus is on keeping people in paid work and attached to their employers, delaying next month’s rise in the NLW could be a sensible move.”

The rate is set by the Low Pay Commission, which recommended an above-inflation increase of 5% last October.

Waters said the temporary measures recently introduced by the government to support employers and workers during the pandemic were “well justified in the current climate”, and as such there was a clear case for deferring the timetabled wage increases.

“The big worry right now of course is keeping people in employment as demand for labour dries up,” he said. “In that context the substantial increases in benefits – for example in Universal Credit and in Housing Benefit – announced last week are clearly an appropriate response as the government tries to protect people’s incomes.

“Whether the planned increase in the national living wage to £8.72 an hour as from the start of April still makes sense is open to question.”

The IFS illustrated how the past five years have seen significant cuts to in-work benefits but increases in minimum wages. However, it points out how wage rises took place at a time when UK employment was “high and rising”.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

It has urged the government to consult the Low Pay Commission on the upcoming rise, potentially even looking at a temporary cut in the minimum wage rate to mirror the temporary increase in benefits.

“The onset of the crisis probably strengthens the case for raising welfare benefits, and weakens the case for raising minimum wages,” said Waters. “So far, the government has done the former.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Handling an acquisition during the coronavirus crisis
next post
‘Don’t ignore health emergency and continue to put staff at risk’, say MPs

2 comments

Jenny Slate 27 Mar 2020 - 9:15 am

This all makes financial sense, however, it is the people on the lowest wages i.e. minimum wage that are working in many of the frontline jobs. Those that are continuing to work on the lowest wage whilst others are furloughed on 80% for sitting at home, and are most likely to feel disgruntled. If you then take away the pay increase they have been waiting for, it is a kick in the teeth for them. Delay the increase for anyone furloughed, but give the increase to those working in my opinion. As the furloughed workers have to go through the HMRC portal it should be easy to separate.

Gary 31 Mar 2020 - 8:23 am

It’s going ahead the government have rejected the advice thank god

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Living wage pushes up spring pay settlements

2 Jul 2025

Graduate pay versus the living wage: an HR...

25 Jun 2025

Capita and PizzaExpress named for minimum wage underpayments

29 May 2025

Next to improve wage-setting transparency after shareholder pressure

16 May 2025

Top 10 HR questions April 2025: increases to...

2 May 2025

Most businesses will need to adjust wages in...

28 Mar 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

April 2025: What’s coming up for HR?

21 Mar 2025

Pharmacies to work to rule over higher employment...

18 Mar 2025

CIPD calls for Employment Rights Bill clarity

6 Mar 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+