Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsPay & benefitsPensions

TUC and Which? urge government to stick to its guns on pensions

by dan thomas 27 Feb 2006
by dan thomas 27 Feb 2006

The TUC and consumer group Which? have urged the government not to give in to industry lobbying by ignoring a key recommendation of the Pensions Commission.

The employee and consumer groups say that ministers should reject the alternatives proposed by both the Association of British Insurers and the National Association of Pension Funds as they are likely to lead to both a worse deal for employees.

Lord Turner’s Pensions Commission recommended that a new National Pensions Savings Scheme should be set up with contributions of 4% from the employee, 3% from the employer and 1% tax relief. This would be invested with a target to keep management charges at 0.3%.

But ministers are expected to hear an alternative from the Association of British Insurers at tomorrow’s meeting.

It wants to establish private savings schemes similar to existing stakeholder pensions to invest the contributions, saying that charges would need to be 0.7%.

However Which? and the TUC cite experts who do not believe that the 0.7% figure can be met, and that the charge could be more than 1%.

Although these differences in charges may appear quite small, they can make a big difference over the lifetime of a pension, the groups said.

Calculations based on a set of standard assumptions about future investment growth show that the average employee who pays into a scheme with higher charges could be almost £25 a week worse off if charges were 1% and even if charges only went up to 0.7% the average employee would still lose over £15 a week, they said.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Peter Vicary-Smith, chief executive of Which? said: “‘Time is running out for the working people of Britain and the Government needs to respond positively to Turner’s recommendations before the next generation of pensioners spend their days in poverty. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for all parties to come together and unite behind ideas which will protect our financial security.”

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: “The government is now under sustained assault from the insurance sector to junk the key proposal from the Turner Commission to set up a National Pensions Savings Scheme run on a low cost basis. Yet these conservative calculations show just how much the average employee stands to lose if ministers give in. In practice it could be a lot more.”

TUC
dan thomas

previous post
Sharp hike in public sector pensions liability
next post
Major players set up IS professional standards body

You may also like

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Medical profession more ableist than wider society: BMA

28 Aug 2025

Lotus to cut 550 jobs to secure sustainable...

28 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Workplace culture (larger...

28 Aug 2025

City law firm freezes junior lawyers’ pay to...

28 Aug 2025

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise