Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionDisabilityUnfair dismissal

Weekly dilemma – dismissal for high level of sickness absence

by Personnel Today 13 Oct 2010
by Personnel Today 13 Oct 2010

One of my employees, who is disabled, has taken an unacceptable amount of sick leave recently. Can I dismiss her lawfully?

While it is possible to fairly dismiss an employee on the ground of incapacity due to ill health, it is vital that you follow a fair procedure. Assuming that the employee in question has more than 12 months’ service, she will have the right to claim unfair dismissal.

If you decide to dismiss, you will need to show that you acted reasonably in treating ill-health incapacity as a sufficient reason to justify the dismissal. It is imperative that you consult with the employee and obtain medical evidence regarding the condition in order to reach the conclusion that the business can no longer employ her. You will also need to know whether or not the sick leave is likely to continue at the same levels, and must follow the principles of the ACAS Code of practice on disciplinary and grievance matters in deciding whether or not to dismiss and, if you decide to do so, in carrying it out.

As you accept that your employee is disabled, you will also have to ensure you are fully compliant with disability discrimination legislation. This has been overhauled after the recent introduction of the Equality Act 2010 (EA), which supersedes the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA). Which regime applies depends on when the potentially discriminatory treatment took place.

There are three potentially relevant types of discrimination under the EA:

  • Direct discrimination, which is treating the employee less favourably than you would treat another on grounds of disability. It is important that your decision to dismiss is consistent with how other employees were treated in similar circumstances.
  • Discrimination arising from disability. Historically this argument was difficult to prove as, following the House of Lords decision in London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm, an employee had to show that they had been treated less favourably than a non-disabled person with similar amounts of sick leave. The EA alters the position in favour of the employee, making it easier for them to successfully claim discrimination on the basis of a disability. To protect yourself from a claim you must ensure that you can justify your decision to dismiss and show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (a more rigorous test than under the DDA).
  • A failure to make reasonable adjustments. You are obliged to make reasonable adjustments that would prevent the employee being put at a disadvantage, in comparison to others, by a provision, criterion or practice. This might mean waiting longer before dismissing the employee, or taking specific steps to help her back to work. Consult with your employee and obtain medical advice as to whether or not there are any adjustments that could be made which would prevent any disadvantage.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Nathan Donaldson, partner, employment, DWF

Get answers to more questions on the Equality Act 2010:

  • Has the fit notes system changed employers’ obligations under the disability discrimination legislation?
  • Should an employer that does not have disabled employees concern itself with good practice in disability?
  • What reasonable adjustments could an employer consider if it employs a member of staff with a disability that fluctuates?

    Personnel Today

    previous post
    Skills shortages could hamper welfare reform programme
    next post
    Public sector L&Ds optimistic despite budget cuts

    You may also like

    Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

    26 Aug 2025

    Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

    26 Aug 2025

    Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

    26 Aug 2025

    Exec hauled over coals for sleeping in sauna...

    22 Aug 2025

    Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

    22 Aug 2025

    X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

    22 Aug 2025

    Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

    22 Aug 2025

    Security manager at BBC unfairly dismissed after ‘misusing’...

    21 Aug 2025

    Reasonable adjustment failures for epilepsy lead to £445k...

    21 Aug 2025

    Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

    21 Aug 2025

    • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
    • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

    Personnel Today Jobs
     

    Search Jobs

    PERSONNEL TODAY

    About us
    Contact us
    Browse all HR topics
    Email newsletters
    Content feeds
    Cookies policy
    Privacy policy
    Terms and conditions

    JOBS

    Personnel Today Jobs
    Post a job
    Why advertise with us?

    EVENTS & PRODUCTS

    The Personnel Today Awards
    The RAD Awards
    Employee Benefits
    Forum for Expatriate Management
    Whatmedia

    ADVERTISING & PR

    Advertising opportunities
    Features list 2025

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin


    © 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

    Personnel Today
    • Home
      • All PT content
    • Email sign-up
    • Topics
      • HR Practice
      • Employee relations
      • Learning & training
      • Pay & benefits
      • Recruitment & retention
      • Wellbeing
      • Occupational Health
      • HR strategy
      • HR Tech
      • The HR profession
      • Global
      • All HR topics
    • Legal
      • Case law
      • Commentary
      • Flexible working
      • Legal timetable
      • Maternity & paternity
      • Shared parental leave
      • Redundancy
      • TUPE
      • Disciplinary and grievances
      • Employer’s guides
    • AWARDS
      • Personnel Today Awards
      • The RAD Awards
    • Jobs
      • Find a job
      • Jobs by email
      • Careers advice
      • Post a job
    • Brightmine
      • Learn more
      • Products
      • Free trial
      • Request a quote
    • Webinars
    • Advertise