Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Age discriminationCase lawEquality, diversity and inclusion

Age discrimination case slips through the net

by Personnel Today 24 Apr 2007
by Personnel Today 24 Apr 2007

Amid the news coverage heralding the introduction of the age discrimination regulations, concerns were expressed that some employers would take the deliberate course of dismissing older workers before 1 October 2006, the commencement date for the regulations, simply to avoid the rights those workers would otherwise have acquired. In one of the first cases under the new regulations to reach the employment tribunal, a woman has won her job back.

Facts

Ann Southcott, a 67-year-old clerical worker in the therapy department of Treliske Hospital in Truro (operated by the Royal Cornwall NHS Trust), claimed her employer had discriminated against her by dismissing her on 30 September 2006, one day before the age regulations came into force. Had the regulations applied to her, she would have been entitled to 11 months’ notice pay on the termination of her employment instead of the 11 weeks that she received. The trust said that it dismissed Southcott and about 30 other employees to help cover a £32m overspend.

Decision

The tribunal did not make a final adjudication on the claim. Instead, the trust agreed to reinstate Southcott with back pay. However, this was not before the tribunal indicated that it was at least arguable that the age discrimination regulations applied to Southcott’s case even though her dismissal took place before 1 October 2006.

The basis for the argument that the regulations applied was a European case called Mangold v Helm (Personnel Today, 21 March 2006), which was decided on 22 November 2005. The rights under the age discrimination regulations are derived from an EC directive formulated in 2000. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that a German worker could rely on the directive in the absence of German national legislation implementing those rights. Remarkably, though, the ECJ came to this conclusion despite the fact that Germany, like the UK, had until December 2006 to implement the directive.

Key implications

It is perhaps not surprising that Southcott’s case, which was backed by public sector union Unison, was compromised at an early stage as a resolution of the issue of whether the age discrimination regulations applied may well have involved protracted legal argument in both the domestic and European courts.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A further limitation on the usefulness of the case concerns the remote chance of similar claims arising in the future. The usual time limit for bringing a claim under the regulations is three months from the date of the act complained of. So there is little likelihood of fresh claims relying on the same argument. Remember, though, that the three-month time limit may be extended for a further three months as long as an employee has raised a grievance in the primary time limit period. This means there may still be cases where the time limit does not expire until the end of the month.

  • Southcott’s case is one of the first under the age discrimination regulations to reach the employment tribunal.
  • The employment tribunal said it was arguable that a claim could be made for age discrimination before 1 October 2006.
  • Employers who dismissed workers before 1 October 2006 to avoid the regulations should be wary.
  • Claims can still be made up until the end of April 2007 if an employee has raised an earlier grievance.

Smair Soor is an employment barrister at Seven Bedford Row

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Company qualifications should be nationally recognised, says CBI
next post
£500,000 on offer for incoming director-general of the CIPD

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Reform UK councils’ staff face WFH ban

6 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+