Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusionRetirement

Default retirement age would be scrapped altogether under Tories and Lib Dems

by Louisa Peacock 14 Apr 2010
by Louisa Peacock 14 Apr 2010

Two of the three main political parties have now pledged to scrap the default retirement age (DRA) should they win the general election in May.


The Liberal Democrats Manifesto 2010, published today, promises to remove the DRA entirely to enable older people to work for as long as it suits them. The document follows hot on the heels of the Conservative manifesto, published yesterday, which also pledged to abolish the DRA should they come to power.


On Monday, Labour pledged only to abolish the DRA at 65 – leaving it open-ended as to whether they will remove it or raise it by a few years. The party was expected to publish the results of a separate review in the summer on any changes to the DRA, enabling interested parties to consult on the proposals.


Business groups were yesterday angered by any suggestion that the DRA would be scrapped.


Both the CBI and manufacturers’ body the EEF warned employers used the DRA to plan future workforces, and claimed the current right to request working beyond 65 was effective.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

However, Rachel Krys, director of the Employers’ Forum on Age, warned the right to request “had no teeth” as it did not encourage honest conversations between employees and managers – leaving staff unable to challenge any decision as to why they might be forced to retire.


Employers simply used the DRA as a cost-cutting measure to get rid of employees, regardless of capability or skill, she claimed.

Louisa Peacock

previous post
Legal implications of failing to train your staff
next post
Sick leave rulings put small firms off hiring new staff

You may also like

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Raise retirement in line with life expectancy, say...

11 Aug 2025

Stroke survivor settles discrimination case for £100k

8 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

Why LGBTQ+ is not one big, happy acronym

25 Jul 2025

MPs ‘openly hostile’ to preferred choice for EHRC...

24 Jul 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise