Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Agency workersEmployment lawHR practice

Agency Workers Regulations not to blame for reduced use of temps, says REC

by Laura Chamberlain 2 Oct 2012
by Laura Chamberlain 2 Oct 2012

The Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) has said that the Agency Workers Regulations (AWR) have had a limited impact on the use of temporary workers, despite warnings elsewhere that they have been a “drag on job creation”.

According to research from the REC, 28% of employers decreased their use of temporary staff in the seven months following the introduction of the AWR on 1 October 2011.

However, more than half (56%) of employers that cut back on their temporary workforce cited economic uncertainty as the key reason behind the move.

In comparison, just 14% said that they had reduced their use of agency workers because of the introduction of the AWR.

Kevin Green, chief executive of the REC, said: “Of the minority of employers who reduced their use of temps most of them made that decision because of the wider financial climate, rather than it being a knee-jerk reaction to the new Regulations, so it makes sense that demand for agency workers will pick up as growth returns.

“In fact, our latest data shows that there’s already been a turnaround and the outlook for temps is starting to improve despite the fact we’re still officially in recession.”

The findings conflict with recent research from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which found that 57% of employers with a temporary workforce had reduced their use of agency workers as a result of the Regulations and 8% had stopped using them altogether.

Neil Carberry, director of employment and skills at the CBI, argued: “The Regulations are thought to have cost businesses more than £1.5 billion in their first year, but temps have not reaped the rewards – instead, the vast majority of this cost has paid for paper-pushing to ensure compliance.

“This has led to a reduction in temps hired in eight out of nine months in 2012, despite a rise in permanent staff being hired.”

The CBI has called on the Government to look at simplifying rules surrounding the 12-week qualifying period, applicable under the AWR, and streamline what they see as the “highly complex” definition of pay under the Regulations in a planned review next year.

This call has been echoed by Richard Sheldon, senior associate at law firm Eversheds, who said that many organisations are struggling to understand how certain provisions under the AWR should be interpreted.

“There is little doubt that the Agency Workers Regulations, introduced in the UK one year ago, have achieved their goal in a number of respects, improving the pay and conditions for many agency workers and allowing them access to staff facilities, such as canteen or childcare facilities.

“But what is also emerging is a picture of considerable misunderstanding and/or misinterpretation of the Regulations, often due to the way in which the Regulations themselves are drafted,” Sheldon said.

Sheldon also said that two of the primary areas for concern for many organisations were the extent to which benefits, such as bonus pay, apply to agency workers, and correctly calculating comparable pay rates between temporary and permanent staff.

However, the REC warned that if the Government’s review of AWR in 2013 is not thorough, changes should not be made to the Regulations.

Green said: “What we don’t want is businesses’ time and energy being wasted on a partial review that upsets the current system, creates uncertainty and could risk interfering with the work of agencies and employers making effective use of temporary staff and keeping the temporary labour market buoyant.”

FAQs on the Agency Workers Regulations

  • How is the 12-week qualifying period under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 calculated?
  • What rights do agency workers have under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 from the first day of their assignment?
  • What rights do agency workers have under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 after the 12-week qualifying period?
  • Under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, are agency workers entitled to bonuses that are payable to direct recruits?

Avatar
Laura Chamberlain

previous post
Employee-owned firms’ shares outstrip FTSE companies
next post
Performance dismissals: myths busted in 60 minutes on-demand webinar

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions November 2023: Holiday carry-over

4 Dec 2023

Legal expert calls new holiday pay regulations ‘incoherent’

30 Nov 2023

What will it mean to be an HR...

28 Nov 2023

Train driver unfairly dismissed after tarantula prank

28 Nov 2023

Cruise giant accused of planning ‘fire and rehire’...

24 Nov 2023

Burges Salmon takes home 2023 Employment Law Firm...

21 Nov 2023

McDonald’s: How can employers prevent sexual harassment?

21 Nov 2023

Tesco equal pay test cases to move to...

17 Nov 2023

Consultation launched on using agency workers during strikes

16 Nov 2023

Minimum service levels: Work notices guidance published

16 Nov 2023

  • How to spot and tackle imposter syndrome in the workplace PROMOTED | Half of all UK adults...Read more
  • BetterMe for Business: How to Build Wellness Culture at Work PROMOTED | Ever encountered a...Read more
  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+