Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

CoronavirusApprenticeshipsEconomics, government & businessLatest NewsEducation

Apprenticeships: training providers’ body to take legal advice over support

by Adam McCulloch 27 Apr 2020
by Adam McCulloch 27 Apr 2020 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

The Association of Employment and Learning Providers is taking legal advice over the omission of support for apprentices being trained at levy-paying employers.

It also accused the Department for Education (DfE) of using the Covid-19 pandemic as a way of reducing the number of independent training providers operating in the apprenticeship market.

Until last Friday (24 April), when fresh guidance was issued by the Education and Skills Funding Agency, the DfE was, said the AELP, ignoring Cabinet Office guidelines that required all government departments to pay all of their contracted suppliers up to the end of June.

Latest apprenticeship news

Levy will no longer be used for MBAs

Providers on brink of collapse

Apprentices can continue learning on furlough 

Fake apprenticeships are turning levy into farce

However, on Friday, the DfE conceded it would honour Cabinet Office guidelines – but only in respect of non-levy-paying training suppliers. This, said the AELP, means that nearly two-thirds of providers (that included colleges and universities) won’t be paid. It stated: “If you are a provider and delivering apprenticeships for levy payers you won’t get paid.”

AELP chief executive Mark Dawe said Friday’s update by the government was a step in the right direction, “but we’re not even halfway there if this is about protecting the livelihoods of existing apprentices and disadvantaged young people on traineeships and study programmes”.

He said that the package did not offer financial support for independent training providers and colleges training for over half of the 628,000 apprentices who were on an apprenticeship programme when the pandemic started. “This is because the Department for Education is claiming that the Cabinet Office supplier relief guidance doesn’t apply in respect of apprentices who are employed by organisations paying the apprenticeship levy.”

Dawes said the organisation’s initial legal advice was that the DfE’s claim was discriminatory against the apprentices outside the scope of today’s package and there were strong grounds for a challenge

He added that AELP shouldn’t have to be going down this route: “The adversely affected apprentices are innocent parties in all this and it shouldn’t matter where they are doing their training if it means that their programmes can continue uninterrupted. Similarly, levy-paying employers shouldn’t be forced to change their chosen training provider in this critical period if the lack of support means that the provider gets into financial difficulty.”

According to the AELP, the DfE should provide across-the-board support for all apprenticeships, traineeships and study programmes and can do this without the need for any bailouts from the Treasury, because the programme budgets for 2020-21 are already in the department’s coffers waiting to be used in accordance with the Cabinet Office guidelines.

Dawes added: “While we don’t have an issue with the specific quality thresholds included in today’s package, the approach so far has reinforced the suspicions of AELP members that the DfE was originally seeking to use the pandemic as an excuse to reduce through a lack of financial support the number of independent training providers operating in the apprenticeship market. This belief is related to the well-documented oversubscribed demands on the levy budget.”

“We hope the House of Commons Education Committee will explore this in its Covid-19 impact inquiry. Sadly a certain amount of trust has been lost between providers and the government, and lessons need to be learnt for the future.”

Gillian Keegan, apprenticeships and skills minister, said the DfE recognised being faced by the sector: “We’ve been encouraging as many providers as possible to shift their training offer online so their students can continue their studies and so that  providers are paid as normal. The sector have been doing a really brilliant job,  as evidenced by the AELP’s recent survey that shows that 81% of apprentices have been able to continue their studies remotely.

“We recognise the significant challenge continuing to deliver training at this time presents. In addition to the HMT support available to all businesses, and the flexibilities we have already introduced to support providers and their students during the Covid-19 outbreak, our Provider Relief Scheme will offer additional financial support so we can continue to deliver the best education and training possible. I would urge all eligible providers to apply.”

Adam McCulloch
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Furlough top-up confusion in museum sector
next post
Boots employee banned from taking breaks wins £7k at employment tribunal

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Strikes: Mayors pledge to avert use of work...

9 Dec 2023

Rejoice! Be merry! The season of HR warnings...

8 Dec 2023

Weak economic outlook slows hiring decisions

8 Dec 2023

Civil servants campaign for four-day week

8 Dec 2023

Oxfam workers begin first-ever strike

8 Dec 2023

Television executive in hospital after bullying report

8 Dec 2023

International business faces ‘permacrisis’ in 2024

8 Dec 2023

Toxic culture at Sellafield ‘threatens safety’

7 Dec 2023

Minimum service levels enacted for rail, borders and...

7 Dec 2023

Aldi announces pay rise for 2024

7 Dec 2023

  • How to spot and tackle imposter syndrome in the workplace PROMOTED | Half of all UK adults...Read more
  • BetterMe for Business: How to Build Wellness Culture at Work PROMOTED | Ever encountered a...Read more
  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+