Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsPay & benefitsPensions

Audit Commission finds London local authority pension schemes too small to deliver cost savings

by Mike Berry 2 Nov 2006
by Mike Berry 2 Nov 2006

London councils could save millions of pounds by making changes to their pension administration arrangements, an Audit Commission study has found.

Its report, Efficiency Challenge: costs of administering local government pension funds in London, published today, suggests a range of options for change.

These include creating one London-wide pension fund and establishing one pension authority to administer London council pensions while retaining individual councils’ funding arrangements.

Each of the 33 local authorities in London, including the City, has its own pension scheme. On average, each fund is worth £355m and has 13,000 members.

If all the schemes were combined the London-wide scheme would have 414,000 members and a value of £11.8bn.

High administration cost

The study found nationally, larger councils’ funds are administered at a much lower cost per member. The average administration cost per London council scheme member is £126 compared to only £44 for metropolitan council funds.

If London boroughs were able to reduce their total administration costs per scheme member to the level of the average metropolitan fund they would spend £34m less each year.

This scale of reduction would require significant change to take place and would therefore take time.

The study found these cost differences are due in part to the ‘London effect’ – the higher cost of salaries and office accommodation in London – but also to the smaller scale of the 33 London schemes. This means they do not benefit from the same economies of scale as other councils.

The chief executive of the Audit Commission, Steve Bundred, has written to key stakeholders to inform them of the findings of the report and the possible options available to them.

Bundred said: “London pension funds cost significantly more to administer than the national average. Our study has identified the reasons for the higher costs, and some options for securing significant savings.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“We hope that the 33 London boroughs, with the support of London Councils and the Department for Communities and Local Government, will use this report to challenge their current pension arrangements and move towards a more efficient system for the benefit of all their members and taxpayers.”

Mike Berry

previous post
Pay structures are unfair to high-performing employees in the public sector
next post
North Sea divers accuse employers of resorting to bully-boy tactics in bid to end strike

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

Skills shortfall in construction threatens housing target

4 Jul 2025

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

It’s all about the Monet: how art transforms...

3 Jul 2025

Stop chasing quick fixes: return to the office...

3 Jul 2025

Asda hails major upgrade in employees’ benefits

3 Jul 2025

100% success for latest large-scale four-day week trial

3 Jul 2025

NHS 10-year Health Plan sets out vision for...

3 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

Decline in workplace deaths: falls from height remain...

3 Jul 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+