Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawLatest NewsReligious discriminationSexual orientation discriminationHuman rights

Bakery in ‘gay cake’ case wins Supreme Court appeal

by Jo Faragher 10 Oct 2018
by Jo Faragher 10 Oct 2018 Daniel and Amy McArthur, the owners of Ashers Bakery, arrive at the Supreme Court in Belfast in May 2018
Press Eye Ltd/REX/Shutterstock
Daniel and Amy McArthur, the owners of Ashers Bakery, arrive at the Supreme Court in Belfast in May 2018
Press Eye Ltd/REX/Shutterstock

The Christian owners of the Northern Irish bakery in the ‘gay cake’ case have won their appeal at the Supreme Court.  

Discrimination claims

Sexual orientation discrimination: Christian bakery’s refusal to make cake with message of support for gay marriage

Sexual orientation discrimination 

Daniel and Amy McArthur, the owners of Ashers in County Antrim, refused to make a cake with the slogan ‘Support Gay Marriage’ for customer Gareth Lee, a gay rights activist, in 2014. He later procured the cake, which included cartoon characters Bert & Ernie, from another branch and was refunded for his original order.

Lee then sued the company for discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and belief.

Ashers lost the case and also the appeal, with the appeal court judges deeming that the bakers’ grounds for refusing to make the cake were “a case of association with the gay and bisexual community and the projected personal characteristic was the sexual orientation of that community”, which supported Lee’s claim of direct discrimination.

However, Lady Hale, the president of the Supreme Court, has now ruled that the bakers did not refuse to fulfil his order because of Lee’s sexual orientation.

The five justices presiding over the Supreme Court case were unanimous in their judgment.

“They would have refused to make such a cake for any customer, irrespective of their sexual orientation,” she said.”Their objection was to the message on the cake, not to the personal characteristics of Mr Lee. Accordingly, this court holds that there was no discrimination on the ground of the sexual orientation of Mr Lee.”

Lady Hale added: “This conclusion is not in any way to diminish the need to protect gay people and people who support gay marriage from discrimination.”

“It is deeply humiliating, and an affront to human dignity, to deny someone a service because of that person’s race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief. But that is not what happened in this case.”

It has been reported that the Equality Commission of Northern Ireland, which supported Lee’s case, spent more than £150,000 of public money on the case. Ashers, supported by the Christian Institute, spent more than £200,000 fighting for this decision.

The decision in this case is relevant for employers because it could influence the outcome of discrimination cases involving sexual orientation or the right to hold religious beliefs.

Nicholas Le Riche, employment partner at law firm Bircham Dyson Bell, said: “The Court found that the decision not to bake the cake was not due to Mr Lee himself but because of the message he wanted decorated on the cake – the McArthurs would have refused this decoration regardless of who the customer was.

“The McArthurs’ own human rights meant that they could not be forced to supply a cake with a message which they strongly disagreed with. The Court was keen to stress that no one should be deprived services because of their personal characteristics but this wasn’t what happened in this case.

“This decision underlines the importance of whether it is the particular service that is being refused, or whether the service is being refused to a particular person.”

Stefan Martin, a partner at Hogan Lovells, added that the Supreme Court had “taken an orthodox and much more limited approach to the extent of protection against associative discrimination than the lesser courts did”.

He said: “For treatment to be direct discrimination because of sexual orientation, it isn’t enough for there simply to be something in the mix that has something to do with the sexual orientation of some people.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“In this case there was no suggestion that the owners of the bakery refused to supply the cake because the customer was gay or because he associated with the gay community. Their objection was to the cake’s message, not its messenger, so the sexual orientation claim failed. While the Supreme Court recognises the importance of protecting people against discrimination, this did not justify extending protection against associative discrimination beyond what the Court regarded as its ‘proper scope’.

“This is likely to make claims involving conflicts of rights – for example between sexual orientation and genuinely held religious beliefs – more difficult to bring in the future.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Mental health presenteeism on the rise
next post
EU searches for construction and health jobs fall as Brexit fears grow

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Supreme Court ruling and EHRC latest: how should...

28 Apr 2025

Union branch wants rights for polyamorous people

9 Apr 2025

EDI should not stifle LGB rights in the...

4 Mar 2025

LGB Alliance launches Business Forum to ‘restore’ gay...

5 Feb 2025

Sharp rise in people identifying as gay and...

30 Jan 2025

President Trump’s DEI backlash: should HR be worried?

24 Jan 2025

Employers need role models to attract young LGBTQ+...

16 Oct 2024

EHRC opens consultation on updated code of practice

2 Oct 2024

Firefighter to receive more than £55k in harassment...

26 Sep 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+