Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Tribunal WatchEmployment lawDisciplineDiscipline and grievancesDismissal

Bank worker who licked – then punched – colleague at party was fairly dismissed

by Stephen Simpson 16 Nov 2015
by Stephen Simpson 16 Nov 2015 Misconduct at a work event can result in disciplinary sanctions and/or dismissal. Photo: Pressmaster/Shutterstock
Misconduct at a work event can result in disciplinary sanctions and/or dismissal. Photo: Pressmaster/Shutterstock

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that a bank worker who licked the face of a colleague and punched him at a work party was fairly dismissed. Stephen Simpson rounds up recent employment decisions.

Key differences justified different sanctions for misconduct at work event
In MBNA v Jones, the EAT found a dismissal was fair despite another employee involved in the misconduct receiving a more lenient sanction.

Work party misconduct

Statement to employees in advance of a Christmas party or similar work-related event

Fair dismissal of employee who punched colleague after Christmas party

Dismissal for involvement in Christmas party “wrestling match” was fair

Podcast: Disciplinary issues arising over the Christmas period

At bank MBNA’s 20th anniversary celebration, Mr Jones had an argument with his colleague, Mr Battersby. Both had been drinking. Battersby kneed Jones in the leg, and Jones responded by licking Battersby’s face.

Later, Battersby noticed that Jones had his arm around Battersby’s sister, and kneed Jones again. Jones then punched him. Following the party, Battersby sent Jones text messages, including threats to “rip his fucking head off”.

MBNA took disciplinary action against both of them: Jones was dismissed for gross misconduct while Battersby received a final written warning.

The employer decided that Battersby’s actions at the work party did not justify dismissal because his texts had been sent after the work event and they were a direct response to being punched.

The employment tribunal held that the penalty for both should have been dismissal and it was unfair to treat Jones differently.

However, the EAT overturned the tribunal decision. The EAT found that there were differences in the employees’ circumstances that justified alternative sanctions.

The EAT said that, once it was established that it was reasonable to dismiss the claimant, leniency to another employee was “neither here nor there”.

Read more details of the case and its implications for employers…

Other tribunal decisions in the headlines

NHS mental health trust admits whistleblower acted in good faith
Britain’s largest mental health trust has admitted that the whistleblower who spoke out about bullying and harassment of staff acted in good faith and in the public interest, reports the Independent.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Part-time teacher wins two year employment battle against school
A part-time teacher dismissed after a school tried to force her to work five days a week has won her two-year battle, according to the Harwich and Manningtree Standard.

Ucatt in umbrella company tribunal victory
Construction union Ucatt says it has won a significant victory against an umbrella company for unlawful deductions from wages.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Occupational Health nurses call for sweeping changes to education and regulation
next post
National living wage research: how will your organisation approach it?

You may also like

MPs reject Lords’ amendments to Employment Rights Bill

16 Sep 2025

Employment lawyers voice AI fears on tribunal claims

15 Sep 2025

Day one rights to make 86% more cautious...

14 Sep 2025

Sainsbury’s manager awarded £60k following colleague’s aggressive behaviour

11 Sep 2025

Estate agent ‘demoted’ after desk move awarded £21k

11 Sep 2025

Employment Rights Bill U-turn unlikely, say legal experts

10 Sep 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

10 Sep 2025

Bar manager told she looked ‘very Aryan’ wins...

9 Sep 2025

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

Employee who shopped online at work wins unfair...

8 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise