Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsIndustrial action / strikesEmployment tribunalsTrade unions

British Airways cabin crew to appeal High Court ruling rejecting injunction against staff changes

by Kat Baker 14 Jun 2010
by Kat Baker 14 Jun 2010

British Airways (BA) cabin crew will appeal a High Court ruling that rejected their call for an injunction and found the airline could legally reduce the number of staff onboard flights, Personnel Today has learned.

If the cabin crew succeed at the Court of Appeal hearing, which will take place in October, the court could impose an injunction on BA forcing it to reinstate the original level of cabin staff on all flights.

John Read, employment law editor at XpertHR, warned a successful appeal by the cabin crew “would be a disaster for BA”.

In November, BA reduced the number of cabin crew onboard each plane below a minimum set out in collective agreements between the airline and the unions.

Cabin crew representatives then took the airline to the High Court in February seeking an injunction against the imposed changes, claiming the collective agreements were incorporated into individual contracts of employment so the changes could only be made with agreement from staff.

But the judge ruled against the cabin crew and found BA could legally make the changes as the relevant terms in the collective agreements were not incorporated into individual employment contracts.

John Hendy QC, who will represent the cabin crew at the Court of Appeal, will argue that thousands of cabin crew are “suffering a material prejudicial impact on their working conditions” which had forced them to work harder and become more stressed, so “there was no reason for the Learned Judge to be unwilling to grant an injunction”.

He will add: “In the absence of an injunction (or any equivalent undertaking to the court from BA), these breaches will simply continue ad infinitum, with the appellants accruing fresh causes of action on a continuous basis, in respect of loss which is (directly) non-pecuniary in nature.”

Read said the BA cabin crew “clearly have a chance of succeeding on appeal” and the case would enable them to add pressure to their dispute with the airline.

“Whether or not a collectively-agreed term is incorporated into employees’ contracts is not straightforward, and the cabin crew clearly have a chance of succeeding on appeal â€“ it’s very unlikely the appeal would go ahead if they didn’t,” he said.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“However, the appeal is another means of the cabin crew putting pressure on BA to resolve the ongoing dispute. If the appeal succeeds and the Court of Appeal grants an injunction â€“ which has to be a possibility given that the cabin crews’ loss is non-pecuniary, being harder work and increased stress â€“ it would be a disaster for BA, which has been operating the reduced crew complements for some time now. BA will be desperate to avoid that happening.”

BA refused to comment on the case.

Kat Baker

previous post
RBS HR chief Neil Roden resigns now bank is ‘stable’ again
next post
Graduates choose interesting jobs over salary reveals Real Prospects

You may also like

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Nurses threaten strikes if pay demands not met

12 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+