Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

British staff will suffer if firms outsource abroad

by Personnel Today 14 Jan 2003
by Personnel Today 14 Jan 2003

Lower wages and more flexibility means that many UK companies are choosing to
outsource aspects of their business to the sub continent

Academics and HR practitioners have long bemoaned the damaging impact of the
global economy on the international labour market.

Initiatives have been launched aimed at creating a level playing field in
employment conditions and reducing ‘social dumping’, whereby multinationals
relocate their labour requirements because of poorer, and therefore cheaper,
employment practices.

The International Labour Organisation is spearheading these, and the EU is
using its generalised system of preferences (a system of tariff reductions) to
promote basic labour standards across the globe.

But less work has been undertaken on outsourcing, as opposed to direct
employment, in foreign countries. Outsourcing within the UK has been
fashionable for decades, allowing a corporation to increase efficiency,
sometimes cut costs and refocus its business back to core competencies.
Everything that is non-core can be outsourced, from cleaning to call centres,
from security to storage.

But globalisation of business has brought a new dimension. In September,
Abbey National signed an outsourcing deal with an Indian supplier to deliver
large-scale IT projects. Prudential, the insurance company, proposed to cut 850
jobs on a transfer of call centre work to India, and is expected to save £16m
per year.

Outsourcing to India and the Far East is high on the agenda of major
corporations.

Companies that have reportedly used offshore outsourcing as a business tool
include BP, Motorola, Compaq, Ford, Skandia and Unum.

Of course, outsourcing has also taken place to areas other than the Indian
sub-continent and the Far East, such as Ireland, Canada and The Netherlands.
Tax breaks for companies delivering support operations there have been
attractive.

But the Indian sub-continent is a paradigm. It has an IT-literate workforce,
language capability, employees amenable to the rigours of quality assurance and
high productivity – often a longer working day than in Europe. Furthermore, it
has been estimated that 200,000 engineers graduated from Indian universities in
2002, and this figure is rising.

Two major factors are cost and flexibility. The workforce is lower paid than
in Europe, and taking advantage of the time zone difference means that an
international corporation can, in practice, operate over a 24-hour day.

Pakistan and the Philippines are also strong competitors, attracting
customers who are prepared to balance lower costs against geo-political
uncertainties.

But what of the UK employees whose jobs are outsourced in this way? Roger
Lyons, general secretary of the union Amicus, described the Abbey National job
losses as "a despicable act".

If the outsourcing took place within the European Union, laws generated by
Brussels in the form of the Acquired Rights Directive (in Britain, known as the
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 or TUPE)
protect many employees on outsourcing by obliging the new service provider to
continue the employment of the employees concerned, with no job losses. But
this protection (apart from information and consultation before the transfer)
does not apply once employees’ jobs are outsourced outside the EU, for example,
to India.

Although redundancy payments would be due, sometimes these amount to no more
than the statutory minimum (in the case of shorter serving workers, often a few
weeks pay only) and the chances of redeployment (unless you are a senior team
player given the job of managing the interface between service provider and
your company) are slim.

The introduction of new technology has always posed a risk for workers’
security of employment. Global outsourcing of information technology and
customer service functions raises the stakes.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

With Indian sub-continent and Far Eastern countries chasing more business
hard, job losses are bound to continue as UK companies are charmed by the
economic advantages.

By John McMullen, Head of employment law, Pinsent Curtis Biddle

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Unpaid overtime is a global problem
next post
Stress standards to put pressure on employers

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+