Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployment lawWorking Time Regulations

Businesses warn axing working time opt-out will affect profits

by Louisa Peacock 22 Dec 2008
by Louisa Peacock 22 Dec 2008

Scrapping the Working Time Directive opt-out will negatively impact on profits, businesses have warned.
 
In a survey of 3,000 employers by staff management consultancy Kronos, 50% of respondents were concerned that removing the exemption would negatively affect their sales and profits. Extra recruitment costs and a weakened customer service were some of the main worries, organisations warned.
 
The exemption currently allows UK employees to voluntarily work more than 48 hours per week. More than one in 10 individuals currently choose to do this. Axing this right would  hinder customer service as many staff worked beyond their contracted hours to earn overtime, according to 65% of employers in the survey.
 
Keith Statham, managing director at Kronos, said: “In the current climate, any negative effect on productivity and customer service will not be welcome by employers.”
 
The European Parliament voted to axe the opt-out last week, causing concern among business groups including the CBI and EEF. Unions however, were pleased with the vote, arguing the UK must make sure its workers are not exploited by a long-hours culture.
 
The decision on whether to scrap it indefinitely will be made within eight weeks, once the parliament and European Council have negotiated.
 
Other survey findings included:




  • Nine in 10 employers surveyed said that some of their employees work more than the average of 48 hours per week. Some 70% of employers said they would need to make changes to their recruitment and retention practices if the opt-out was removed. 


  • Respondents were considering options that included: implementing a technology solution to help improve productivity and efficiency (50%), using more flexible working contracts (45%); recruiting additional workers (35%) and multi-skilling/training existing employees.


  • A further 45% of respondents believed it would be difficult or extremely difficult to accurately monitor employee working hours without the opt-out, with half that number fearing admin costs would shoot up.

 Last month employers told Personnel Today that pay hikes were inevitable as employees prevented from working overtime would demand extra money or threaten to leave.

Avatar
Louisa Peacock

previous post
Friday Podcast: Working Time Directive opt-out, TUPE ruling
next post
Council staff to receive pay rise far above national minimum wage

You may also like

Don’t be gloomy over social mobility in the...

24 Jun 2022

Christian awarded £22k following dismissal over religious necklace

24 Jun 2022

Movers and shakers June 2022: Lloyds, Indeed, Zoom...

24 Jun 2022

Gender pensions gap: women’s retirement pot less than...

24 Jun 2022

White-hot recruitment market? William Tincup talks to Oven-Ready...

24 Jun 2022

British Airways employees at Heathrow vote for walkouts

24 Jun 2022

Young people need more guidance over ‘green jobs’

24 Jun 2022

Government to repeal agency workers ban during strikes

23 Jun 2022

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for...

23 Jun 2022

Brexit remains an ‘open wound’ for EU employees...

23 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+