Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsTrade unions

Can Wal-Mart keep unions out?

by Personnel Today 14 Mar 2006
by Personnel Today 14 Mar 2006

Barely a week goes by without Wal-Mart making the headlines with allegations of bad working practices.

The world’s largest retailer is one of a select group of multinational brands that provokes strong reaction from people because of the way it treats its employees.

Many share the concerns of US senator Ted Kennedy, who said: “Wal-Mart violates American family values every single day by mistreating its workers”.

The list of allegations against Wal-Mart, which has 1.7 million employees worldwide, including 140,000 Asda staff in the UK, is growing.

Wal-Mart faces dozens of lawsuits, including a class action discrimination case involving 1.6 million current and former female workers. A recent verdict ordered the company to pay $172m (£99m) to employees in California for lost breaks, while government agents last year arrested hundreds of illegal immigrants working at Wal-Mart facilities.

The retailer’s approach to health benefits in the US has come in for particular criticism. Despite chief executive Lee Scott acknowledging that health insurance – which is not free in the US – is unaffordable for many staff, due to eligibility requirements, cost and waiting times, Wal-Mart provides little help for its workers.

Price of benefits

In 20 states, Wal-Mart is the leading employer-user of state-funded medical care and the ‘Wake-up Wal-Mart’ campaign, organised by the North American unions, estimates that each store that employs 200 staff can cost taxpayers $420,750 (£241,000) annually.

But rather than investing more itself, the company is investigating other ways to cut costs.

The vice-president of benefits, Susan Chambers, recently ignited national fury for suggesting that costs should be reduced by discouraging unhealthy, overweight and older people from working at Wal-Mart.

The spotlight on its employment practices isn’t just focused on the US. In the UK, Asda is facing mounting criticism from unions over its employment practices, with three high-profile tribunal defeats in the past month (see box).

The unions say the company has been allowed to get away with such practices because of its no-union policy, as outlined on the Wal-Mart website: “We are not against unions. They may be right for some companies, but there is simply no need for a third party to come between our associates and their managers.”

The retailer instead promotes its Open Door policy, allowing grievances to be addressed anywhere up the corporate ladder.

But Shane Dawson, chief Canadian organiser for the United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW), said the policy merely helped the company to “identify troublemakers”.

In Canada, the company’s claim not to be “against unions” was called into question by the Quebec Labour Board recently, when ruling over the closure of a Wal-Mart store in Jonquire last year.

The board heard that, after staff joined the UFCW, contract negotiations stalled and the only unionised Wal-Mart store in North America closed. It called the move a “reprisal against unionised employees”.

Unions unwelcome
Wal-Mart insists the store was struggling economically and that meeting union demands would completely change its business model.

Company spokesman Kevin Groh says union votes in several other Canadian Wal-Mart stores have been clearly defeated. But UFCW spokesman Louis Bolduc said: “They sent a message. Unions are not welcome.”

The union alleged that management in Jonquire used store cameras and security guards to spy on workers, and engaged in psychological harassment, even sending inspectors and engineers to stores and hinting the building might need to be demolished.

But despite all this scrutiny and criticism – which is likely to intensify with Wal-Mart’s intention to enter the banking business – Americans continue to flock to the company for jobs. About 25,000 people applied for 325 jobs at a recent Illinois store opening.

Groh said half of Wal-Mart managers started as hourly workers, and turnover is 15% lower than the national average. About 10 people apply for every job at new stores, he said, and people keep applying “because we draw applicants from all walks of life: teens working part-time, people starting retail careers, and seniors wanting to remain active”.

Wal-Mart also points to its high score on a prominent Canadian Best Employers list last year. Mario Pilozzi, chief executive officer at Wal-Mart Canada, attributed the rating to “strong corporate culture and a great team of associates”.

The company is clearly a strong believer in its business model and, with global sales of about £150bn, many would find it hard to argue.
Whether its employment practices can work at Asda in the UK and at other foreign operations is harder to judge. Seasoned Wal-Mart observers will be watching closely to find out.

Asda in the dock

Last week, an Asda worker sacked for leaving the shopfloor to take an epilepsy pill won more than £7,000 in compensation for unfair dismissal.

Paul Turner told an employment tribunal he was away for just seven minutes to take his medication because he was feeling unwell. But the tribunal heard managers at the Asda warehouse in Greater Manchester accused him of taking a break to watch last year’s European cup final.

Turner, who had worked for the supermarket giant for 10 years, made his claim under the Disability Discrimination Act.

Last month, a tribunal in Newcastle-upon-Tyne ruled that Asda had breached the Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act (1992) by offering staff at its Washington depot a 10% pay rise if they gave up membership of the GMB union.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The tribunal directed the retailer to pay £2,500 to each of the 340 GMB members, amounting to £850,000. Asda is to appeal.

Also in February, Asda was forced to pay £27,750 in compensation to 37 Asian workers for racial discrimination. A manager at the supermarket’s branch in Lutterworth, Leicestershire, ordered the employees to produce documents to prove they had the right to work in the UK to ensure Asda was not employing illegal immigrants.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Avon police chief admits race recruitment blunder
next post
Age discrimination is already illegal

You may also like

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

How can businesses build protections for gig workers?

7 May 2025

Two-thirds of school leaders suffering mental ill health

6 May 2025

Resident doctors to ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

Ofgem workers ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

University of East Anglia set for nine days...

2 May 2025

Unite announces further Gatwick airport strikes

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+