Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawLocal authoritiesEmployment tribunals

Case of the week: Patel v South Tyneside Council and others

by Helen Hall 2 Feb 2012
by Helen Hall 2 Feb 2012

Patel v South Tyneside Council and others

FACTS

Mr Patel brought an employment tribunal claim against South Tyneside Council. The tribunal decision was signed and sent to the parties on 9 May 2011 (decision 1) but, because of a clerical error, was wrongly dated as sent to the parties on 9 April. A second decision (decision 2) was sent to the parties on 12 May 2011, with the correct date of 9 May 2011.

On 17 June 2011, Mr Patel’s representatives emailed the appeal notice to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) and received a successful delivery notification. On 22 June, the representatives contacted the EAT and were informed that no appeal notice had been received.

They resubmitted the appeal notice after hours on 22 June, so that it was recorded as having been lodged on 23 June. On 5 July, the employment tribunal signed and dated a certificate of correction to decision 1, amending the date. The EAT refused to accept the appeal notice as being out of time, as it was lodged more than 42 days after the date the decision was sent to the parties. Mr Patel appealed.

DECISION

The EAT held that the appeal notice of 17 June was in time. It had been emailed to an email address of the EAT and had been successfully delivered, even if it did not appear in the EAT inbox. What mattered was that it had “hit” the EAT server, which was evidenced by the successful delivery notification. In this respect, the EAT followed the recent decision in Yellow Pages Sales Ltd v Davie EATS/0017/11, which concerned a malfunctioning fax machine. The EAT in that case held that a document had been served on the tribunal where it was successfully transmitted to the tribunal fax machine, even if it did not print out.

Decision 2 was not a correction of decision 1 but an entirely fresh judgment and the time to appeal the new decision ran from the date on which it was sent to the parties. There was in fact no need to amend the date on decision 1 but, if it did need to be corrected, this should have been done by certificate of correction. Accordingly, the appeal notice lodged on 23 June was also in time, as time ran from the date decision 2 was sent to the parties.

In any event, if either appeal notice was out of time, time should be extended in the exceptional circumstances of this case. Mr Patel’s advisers were entitled to assume that the appeal notice had been properly served, having received notification of successful delivery.

IMPLICATIONS

The main implication of this case is that, even if the deadline for an appeal has passed, it is not safe for the other party to assume that no appeal has been lodged, even if the EAT confirms that it has not received one.

Equally, when communicating with the tribunal or EAT by electronic means, it is not safe to assume that notification of successful delivery necessarily means that the tribunal has actually “received” the communication.

This places parties and representatives in a difficult position, as they are discouraged by the tribunals from routinely telephoning to confirm receipt. It is vital that copies are kept of successful delivery notifications in anticipation of a subsequent challenge. In addition, parties should make efforts not to leave the submission of documents until the last minute so that there is a window for resubmission if there are difficulties with transmission.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helen Hall, employment partner, DLA Piper








Practical guidance from XpertHR:



  • What is the procedure for appealing against the decision of an employment tribunal?
  • On what grounds can the decision of an employment tribunal be appealed?
  • What is the time limit for appealing against the decision of an employment tribunal?

Helen Hall

previous post
Companies should publish policies on alcohol, says Alcohol Concern
next post
Accident reporting changes to cut burden on employers

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+