Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Economics, government & businessEmployment lawDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)Case lawEmployment tribunals

Case of the week: Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Coward and another

by Nicholas Jew 12 Sep 2011
by Nicholas Jew 12 Sep 2011

Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Coward and another

FACTS

Ms Coward was made redundant and, soon after, her former employer was dissolved. She claimed unpaid statutory redundancy pay of £5,481 and unpaid notice pay of £2,030 from the Secretary of State under ss.166 and 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. These provisions allow claimants to recover sums from the Government when a company ceases trading.

The employment tribunal allowed both claims.

The Secretary of State accepted that the statutory redundancy pay was due under s.166 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, as Ms Coward had taken all reasonable steps short of litigation against the company to recover that sum. However, it appealed the decision relating to the notice pay, where claims are subject to a different statutory test.

DECISION

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) noted that, under s.182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a claimant can recover notice pay only if his or her former employer is “insolvent” within the definition set out in s.183 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Under that section, the company must have been subject to winding-up, administration, appointment of a receiver, or a voluntary arrangement. Each of these requires an appropriate formal filing to be made to Companies House.

In the case of Ms Coward’s former employer, the Companies House records simply showed that the company had been dissolved. The employment tribunal had erred in finding that the company had been insolvent on the basis of its accountant’s evidence that it had been unable to pay its debts. This was not the correct test and, as no formal insolvency process had taken place, Ms Coward’s claim under s.182 could not succeed.

The appeal was upheld.

IMPLICATIONS

The EAT was asked by Ms Coward to exercise discretion. The decision serves as a reminder to claimants that the tribunal does not have any discretion in this area, as the legislation is clear. In such situations, while the Government will cover any unpaid statutory redundancy pay, it will not extend to unpaid notice pay unless the employer was officially insolvent.

Nicholas Jew, employment partner, DLA Piper

Practical guidance from XpertHR on insolvency

  • How to deal with insolvency The XpertHR “how to” section explains how employers should manage the consequences of insolvency for employees.
  • Termination of employment: insolvency The XpertHR employment law manual provides guidance on the employment implications of a company going insolvent.
  • Form providing advance notification to the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills of redundancies Use this model form to comply with your obligation to notify the secretary of state for business, innovation and skills where you propose to make 20 or more employees redundant within a 90-day period.

Avatar
Nicholas Jew

previous post
GPs express views on health of the nation
next post
Flawed commissioning ‘wastes up to 60% of training’, says KnowledgePool

You may also like

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Employment tribunal: use of word ‘bald’ can amount...

13 May 2022

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

‘Small spike’ in minimum wage underpayment among 20-24...

13 May 2022

Fears over skills as visa application times double...

12 May 2022

Green energy jobs given lift by new Delivery...

12 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

MP seeks legal protections for employees undergoing fertility...

9 May 2022

Solicitor unfairly dismissed during cancer recovery awarded £17k

6 May 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+