Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawDismissalUnfair dismissal

Case of the week: Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

by Clare Gregory 8 Nov 2011
by Clare Gregory 8 Nov 2011

Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

FACTS

Mr Zulhayir was a delivery driver for JJ Food Service Ltd. Mr Zulhayir was on long-term sick leave from January 2005, following an accident at work that resulted in serious spinal injuries.

In January 2006, Mr Zulhayir moved house and failed to notify JJ Food Service Ltd of his new address. All contact between Mr Zulhayir and the employer ceased. Having not received a current sick note, the employer wrote to Mr Zulhayir on 28 June 2006 stating that, if he did not contact it by 5 July 2006, JJ Food Service Ltd would conclude that Mr Zulhayir had terminated his contract of employment.

The letter was returned unopened and JJ Food Service Ltd made no further attempts to contact Mr Zulhayir, despite his having commenced a personal injury claim against it. JJ Food Service Ltd treated Mr Zulhayir as dismissed from 5 July 2006.

Mr Zulhayir did not in fact see the letter until May 2009, when he received another letter from JJ Food Service Ltd’s solicitors at his new address regarding his personal injury claim (which enclosed a copy of the letter). Mr Zulhayir promptly brought a claim for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract arising from failure to pay notice and unpaid holiday pay.

DECISION

At a pre-hearing review, Mr Zulhayir’s claim was struck out for being out of time. The judge found that Mr Zulhayir’s failure to inform JJ Food Service Ltd of his change of address in breach of his obligation contained in the handbook constituted implied unilateral termination by him.

On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned this decision and held that Mr Zulhayir was not “self-dismissed” because JJ Food Service Ltd had not accepted the repudiation of his contract. The letter did not amount to acceptance of Mr Zulhayir’s resignation and JJ Food Service Ltd should have attempted to contact Mr Zulhayir via his solicitors when the letter was returned. No effective steps were then taken by either party to terminate Mr Zulhayir’s employment until JJ Food Service Ltd’s letter in May 2009.

Mr Zulhayir’s claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract were in time and were remitted to the employment tribunal. His claims for disability discrimination and holiday pay claims were continuing acts and therefore also in time.

IMPLICATIONS

This case highlights the importance of clear, effective and unambiguous communication between employers and employees, particularly in respect of termination of employment. The notion of “self-dismissal” was rejected by the EAT; both parties must act on a breach to terminate employment.

Employers must be pro-active; silence is not acceptance, and employers cannot rely on employees’ inaction to terminate employment.

Employers must be careful in such circumstances, as a failure to ensure that a contract has been terminated may not only entitle an employee to receive continuing pay and benefits, but may also allow them to bring a claim for unfair dismissal long after the date that the employer believed the employment relationship had ended.

It seems likely that, if JJ Food Service Ltd had pleaded frustration of contract at the pre-hearing review, its application for strike out could have succeeded on those grounds.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Clare Gregory, employment partner, DLA Piper

Practical guidance from XpertHR on resignations and dismissals

  • Resignation or dismissal: employment tribunal decisions This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five employment tribunal cases where the key issue was whether the employee resigned or was dismissed.
  • No “special circumstances” retraction for clear but mistaken words of dismissal In CF Capital plc v Willoughby [2011] EWCA Civ 1115 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the employer could not retract clear written words of dismissal that were accepted at face value by the employee, even though the inclusion of the words in the letter was a mistake.
  • Resignations: employee notice We began a series of articles on resignations with an overview of employees’ notice obligations and employers’ rights in relation to employee notice.

Clare Gregory

Clare Gregory is a partner in the employment team in the Sheffield office of DLA Piper UK.

previous post
Union accuses Government over ‘misleading’ pension figures
next post
CIPD president calls for leadership from HR

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+