To continue reading please register or login to your OHW+ account.
Just when we thought the true role of people management was making a long overdue comeback, look at the privatised utilities. The recent spate of competitive sackings does not suggest cool strategic planning of the people resource.
Someone somewhere has had lunch in the City and the word is this sector had better beware. Utilities' share prices are under threat, so we must do something. The regulator has decided prices in these near-monopolies are too high, so the utilities must cut costs to meet the new lower prices. The City is not happy about levels of "shareholder reward", and multinational predators are presumed to be in lying in wait. And, of course, the only known source of cost is people's jobs. So 1,000 must go here, and we can let 1,500 go there.
Several thoughts strike the modern trade union official about all this. If it's so easy to let these people go, why were they not thrown out long ago? What sort of managers were they that let their company carry such extra burdens of cost in the first place?
Why is the quality of service in the company not going to be undermined when these people go? If we have electric power lines down, if sewage repairs in cities are an obvious cause for concern, will enough skilled people be on call? Can we rely on the safety issues in all these utilities getting the complete attention of management?
Or are these announcements nothing more than showing off to impress the luncheon companions of the chief executive in the City? When push comes to shove, will it all be sorted out through an early retirement here and a generous "hamper" for managerial grades there?
Several other more substantial thoughts spring to mind. First, despite all the consultation and "people are our greatest asset" bombast, the announcements come as a shock to most of those affected. Companies still do not spend enough time explaining what the global economy might do to us at a whim. Few people who produce the goods or services under review have the faintest idea what criteria banks and City institutions apply. Only the Bank of England has tried to educate trade union officials as to the financial criteria that affect company set-up or survival decision-making in the financial world.
There is clearly so far to go in being confident that everyone understands these key influences in company fortunes. It's the same old story. Only when employees
