Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Civil ServiceEconomics, government & businessLatest NewsEmployee engagementEthics

Setback for civil servants’ union in bid to stop Rwanda flight

by Adam McCulloch 10 Jun 2022
by Adam McCulloch 10 Jun 2022 Priti Patel in Rwanda
Reuters/Alamy
Priti Patel in Rwanda
Reuters/Alamy

The PCS union, together with human rights groups have failed in their initial bid to stop the Home Office’s plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda.

The legal move was aimed at preventing asylum seekers being flown to the east African country under the controversial policy announced by home secretary Priti Patel in April. The first removal flight, carrying up to 130 people, is scheduled for 14 June.

Home Office staff are said to be angry about their role in implementing the plan and have started an anonymous Twitter group encouraging resistance within the department and have been speaking out against Patel’s plans to the wider media.

Lawyers are acting for about 100 of the asylum seekers to prevent the first flight from taking off. Although late on Friday 10 June the High Court ruled that the flight could go ahead an appeal is expected to be heard on 13 June.

The civil service’s biggest union, the PCS, had joined charity Care4Calais and campaign group Detention Action in acting for four of the asylum seekers and argued that the policy itself, as well as the removal of the four asylum seekers, was unlawful.

The UN’s refugee agency has stated the plans breached international law and failed to meet the required standards of “legality and appropriateness” for transferring asylum seekers from one country to another.

Civil service

Home Office civil servants angry at Rwanda asylum seekers plan

Union brands civil servant pay rise an ‘insult’

Atmosphere in Whitehall is ‘poisonous’, unions claim

The PCS and campaigners said the Home Office needed to set out the legal basis for the policy in several areas: whether the home secretary had legal authority to carry out the removals; her conclusion that Rwanda was generally a “safe third country” for asylum seekers to live in; and whether the Home Office had made inadequate provision for malaria prevention, and compliance with the Human Rights Act. They said Patel had so far not provided answers.

Solicitors representing PCS, Detention Action and Care4Calais sent a letter before action – the formal start of the process for a judicial review challenge at the High Court – to the Home Office last month. But now the claimants are seeking an injunction to stop next week’s flight as Patel has given no assurances that she will wait for the policy to be tested in court before pressing ahead with flights.

PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said the Rwanda removals policy showed the government had “learned nothing from the Windrush scandal”, in which Commonwealth nationals with a right to live in the UK were wrongly deported and denied access to services.

Traumatic situations

“PCS is not prepared to countenance our members being put in potentially dangerous and traumatic situations, where they may be asked to act illegally,” he said.

“PCS is determined to work for a more humane environment on asylum and immigration. This would give our members the time, space and resources that they need to carry out their jobs properly and would improve the experience of refugees. This latest judicial review application is key to that endeavour.”

A Home Office spokesperson said: “We have been clear from the start that we expected legal challenges – however, we are determined to deliver this new partnership.”

Meanwhile, Home Office staff rebelling against the policy have set up a Twitter account called @Our_Home_Office to air grievances over the plans and encourage staff to display ‘Refugees Welcome’ stickers.

The account launched its campaign last month with a poster said to have been posted on an official notice board which reads: “We have the spine to say, ‘no minister’.”

It adds: “No to hostile environments, no to shutting down democracy, no to racist deportations.”

One Home Office worker with long experience of the refugee and asylum department told Sky News they felt ashamed to work for the government because of its asylum seeker plans.

Human trafficking

They said there was “disbelief” at the policy within their department – likening it to a form of human trafficking.

The worker said: “It is not only just going to create more hurt for those individuals but internally for the department – despite raising concerns about it, we are being told it’s our duty as civil servants to implement the policy irrespective of our concerns around it.”

The employee added that internally staff had raised concerns with the permanent secretary in the Home Office about how the policy was going to be implemented; whether it was legal; and the impact on families, children, and LGBTQ asylum seekers.

They said most staff were “trying to do a job that means the UK provides safety for refugees from across the world – we are in it to try and make people’s lives better. But we feel like we are being forced to implement a policy that is the opposite of that and most staff disagree with that.”

A Home Office spokesperson said the Home Office was committed to constructive conversations with staff on its policies and said: “Our world-leading partnership with Rwanda is a key part of our strategy to overhaul the broken asylum system and break the evil people-smugglers’ business model.”

On Friday (10 June) it emerged that the government had cancelled the removal directions for three people who had asked the High Court to prevent their deportation. In the hearing, it emerged two more people will also have them cancelled.

However, it was later confirmed that the High Court had ruled that the flight could go ahead. Yvette Cooper, Labour shadow home secretary, in response, wrote on Twitter that the plan was “unworkable, unethical, extortionately expensive, and profoundly un-British”.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He also works for a national newspaper and is the author of KentWalksNearLondon

previous post
Care workers to strike over ‘cruel’ fire and rehire threat
next post
Wording of diversity statements critical to policies’ success

You may also like

MP seeks action on Passport Office’s ‘toxic’ working...

29 Jun 2022

Civil Service signs Menopause Workplace Pledge

7 Jun 2022

Civil Service Fast Stream graduate scheme paused

31 May 2022

Civil servants move closer to national strike action

25 May 2022

Rees-Mogg under fire from civil service leader over...

13 May 2022

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

Home Office civil servants angry at Rwanda asylum...

22 Apr 2022

Department for Education staff told to return to...

22 Apr 2022

Hybrid working: executives returning to office less than...

21 Apr 2022

Disabled worker discriminated against by hot-desking policy

21 Apr 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+