Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawMarriage and civil partnership discriminationHuman rightsPensions

Co-habiting unmarried partner wins pensions case

by Rob Moss 8 Feb 2017
by Rob Moss 8 Feb 2017 Denise Brewster and her late partner Lenny McMullen
Copyright: Denise Brewster
Denise Brewster and her late partner Lenny McMullen
Copyright: Denise Brewster

Unmarried partners of occupational pension scheme members should be eligible for survivor pension benefits, regardless of whether or not they have been nominated, following a judgment on 8 February at the Supreme Court.

Local government pension schemes

Local authority pensions: the law

Consultation on proposals to improve the operation of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations

Determine an employee’s entitlement to ill-health retirement benefits under the Local Government Pension Scheme

Denise Brewster lived with her partner Lenny McMullan for 10 years before the couple got engaged on 24 December 2009. Mr McMullan died suddenly two days later and had not left a will.

He had paid into a local government pension scheme for 15 years, but had not filled in a form nominating his partner to receive a survivor’s allowance.

Ms Brewster argued that she was discriminated against by the Northern Ireland Local Government Officers’ Superannuation Committee (NILGOSC), which administered the scheme, because – owing to the lack of a completed form – it refused her a survivor’s pension.

This case concerns a requirement in the Local Government Pension Scheme (Benefits, Membership and Contributions) Regulations 2009 that unmarried scheme members’ partners be nominated to be eligible for a survivor’s pension.

The High Court held that the requirement to nominate was incompatible with art.14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits discrimination, when read alongside art.1, the “peaceful enjoyment of possessions”.

This ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, but the original High Court judgment effected changes to the equivalent regulations in England, Wales and Scotland, and these rules were amended to remove the nomination requirement in such pension schemes.

This rule change prompted Ms Brewster to appeal to the Supreme Court, which today unanimously ruled that the nomination requirement in the 2009 Regulations should be “disapplied”, and that Ms Brewster is entitled to receive a survivor’s pension.

Lesley Harrold, senior knowledge lawyer at Norton Rose Fulbright, said: “As there was no requirement in the [pension scheme] for married members or those in civil partnerships to nominate in a signed declaration their spouse/civil partner as beneficiary, it was difficult to justify a need for cohabitees – who satisfied the scheme’s other requirements in terms of the cohabitees’ relationship stability and longevity – to do so.”

She added that a Law Commission inquiry had concluded that it was generally desirable that local government employees should have equivalent pension benefits right across the UK.

Some media reports today have suggested that the ruling could increase liabilities in local government pension schemes, but legal experts have told Personnel Today that it is unlikely to “open the floodgates”.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Nick Stones, partner at law firm Pinsent Masons, said: “It could impact any scheme, be that in the public or private sectors, which imposes a requirement for co-habiting couples to opt in to receive the benefit when the criteria for entitlement can be evidenced in some other manner and where, in contrast, there is an automatic presumption of eligibility for their married or civil partner contemporaries.

“The implications for the local government scheme are localised to Northern Ireland; Scotland and England and Wales abolished the need to opt in some years ago.”

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Unpaid tribunal awards: enforcement officers recover thousands
next post
Employment tribunal decisions now online

You may also like

Pensions regulator: make sure summer staff don’t miss...

18 Jun 2025

EHRC defends interim update as ‘balance of clarity...

13 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Pension Schemes Bill should be ‘hugely beneficial’ for...

5 Jun 2025

Liberty to challenge EHRC consultation in High Court

3 Jun 2025

Pension reforms could put savings at risk, group...

30 May 2025

HMRC releases research on removing salary sacrifice tax...

28 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+