Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsPay & benefitsGlobal HRPensions

Companies cut contributions to defined-benefit pension schemes

by Laura Chamberlain 2 Sep 2010
by Laura Chamberlain 2 Sep 2010

Multinational companies making changes to their defined-benefit (DB) pension schemes are cutting back on their contributions, according to new international research.

One-third of respondents said they were looking to make changes to their schemes in the near future and, in these plans, the average level of employer future service contributions will drop to 10%.

Chris Sheppard, head of Mercer’s Scheme Design Group, said: “A notable change has been the drop in average size of employer contribution. This reduces the cost of schemes. However, with employee contribution rates broadly the same, less company contribution has a detrimental impact on an employee’s retirement.”

The survey by Mercer found that only 14% of the companies surveyed said their DB schemes were open to future accrual, compared to 38% saying they were not. Nearly half of employers said their DB plans were closed to new entrants.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber told Personnel Today: “Some changes will have been secured through negotiation with unions and employers working together to make defined-benefit schemes secure and sustainable. They give the lie to the notion that DB schemes cannot work today. Others will have been imposed on staff and represent little more than an employer retreat from decent pensions.”

He added that two out of three private sector staff were not in any employer backed pension and that the government review of the 2012 reforms will have the most impact on future pension provision.

For those companies considering making changes to their plans, the most popular tactics were found to be closing the scheme to future accrual and reducing the accrual rate. Other ideas include increasing member contributions, closing the scheme to new entrants, switching to CARE schemes or reducing pension increases.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Alison Bailey, head of policy and technical development at the Pensions Advisory Service, said: “A lot of companies are closing schemes to future accrual or putting in place other changes. So, for example, they might change the level of accrual. If they were providing one-60th of final salary for every year’s service they may change it to one-80th or they might be closing the schemes to future benefit accrual altogether.”

Mercer’s Scheme Design survey analysed responses from 220 multinational companies in the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy and the Benelux countries.

Laura Chamberlain

previous post
HR news round-up: HR stories making the headlines 2 September 2010
next post
Free Guides: Getting the most out of your Sales team

You may also like

Man who juggled four council jobs guilty of...

18 Jul 2025

House of Lords votes against day-one dismissal rights

18 Jul 2025

Government launches call for evidence on unpaid internships

18 Jul 2025

Hospitality made up 45% of latest job losses

18 Jul 2025

‘Window of opportunity’ to avert resident doctor strikes

18 Jul 2025

Jaguar Land Rover to lose 500 management roles

18 Jul 2025

Gender pay gaps narrow in 2024-25

17 Jul 2025

UK job vacancies fall to a 10-year low

17 Jul 2025

Zero-hours employees may have to request guaranteed hours

17 Jul 2025

How to avoid the ‘Netflix effect’ in learning...

17 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+