Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Pay & benefitsPensions

Competitive edge lost in fight to preserve pensions

by Ross Bentley 25 Jul 2006
by Ross Bentley 25 Jul 2006

Weighed down by obligations to reduce pension deficits and preserve pension schemes, UK companies say their ability to remain competitive is being severely compromised.

A survey of more than 350 chief executives and senior board members, published by the CBI last week, found that three-quarters (74%) of firms with defined benefit schemes have experienced a significant reduction in profits as pensions costs have grown.

The report also discovered that 40% of companies with defined benefit pension schemes are having to trim down their investment in the business, with one in five firms saying they have been forced to cut jobs.

Particularly arduous are the requirements to settle pension deficits within a reduced timeframe, and increases in contributions to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) levy, the statutory fund set up to pay compensation to members of defined benefit pension schemes should their employer be declared insolvent.

Tim Keogh, a worldwide partner at Mercer Human Resource Consulting, the firm that carried out the survey for the CBI, said: “When the PPF was set up last year, companies were told they’d have to find £300m annually, but this year the cost will be around £575m.

“While the PPF is a good idea, it’s painful for businesses when they have to pay such a premium,” he said.

Couple this with a fall in stock values, a reduction in long-term interest rates and an increased life expectancy, and employers are under the cosh, said Keogh.

But, according to the TUC’s pension officer Michelle Lewis, the hardship now being experienced by many companies has as much to do with their lack of foresight as it does with the testing conditions under which they are currently operating.

“These trends haven’t happened overnight. When pension schemes were performing well, many employers took their eye off the ball and took contribution holidays, while employees continued to pay in,” she said.

“Companies should have made provisions, now it’s come back to haunt them. It’s a bit short-sighted to start whinging now.”

Also contributing to this climate of uncertainty, said Keogh, are the Pension Regulator’s powers to intervene in corporate deals where pensions are an issue, such as mergers and acquisitions – a concern for almost 80% of those in the CBI report.

The EEF, the manufacturers’ body, confirmed these fears in a recent survey of its 6,000 members.

David Yeandle, EEF deputy director of employment policy, said: “Weighing up the implication of pension deficits prior to a merger or acquisition is taking up more and more senior management time and is another hurdle to any deals being struck.”

Yeandle also echoes CBI members’ concerns about the disparity that exists between public and private sector pension provision.

The CBI report found the government’s agreement to allow some public sector workers to retire at 60 was making it difficult for companies to raise the retirement age in their own schemes or remove early retirement options. 

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“We are in danger of creating an environment where, because of their different pension arrangements, labour mobility between the private and public sector may become increasingly difficult, and that isn’t healthy,” he said.

 

Ross Bentley

previous post
Weekly dilemma…
next post
Letter of the week…

You may also like

NHS 10-year Health Plan sets out vision for...

3 Jul 2025

Living wage pushes up spring pay settlements

2 Jul 2025

Why bosses must set pay independently

2 Jul 2025

Reforming paternity leave could benefit UK by £13bn...

30 Jun 2025

Bank of England says NIC rise is dampening...

27 Jun 2025

Graduate pay versus the living wage: an HR...

25 Jun 2025

Pensions regulator: make sure summer staff don’t miss...

18 Jun 2025

Pension Schemes Bill should be ‘hugely beneficial’ for...

5 Jun 2025

Pension reforms could put savings at risk, group...

30 May 2025

HMRC releases research on removing salary sacrifice tax...

28 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+