Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Dismissal before a year’s service

by Personnel Today 15 May 2001
by Personnel Today 15 May 2001

Many employers believe that when dismissing an employee with less than a
year’s service there is no need to follow procedures or worry about unfair
dismissal. This is not necessarily so. This article examines where such a
dismissal could give rise to such a claim, and where the employee could recover
more than notice pay for breach of contract.

Beware – there is no qualifying period for unfair dismissal, for example,
where an employee is dismissed for:

– Asserting a statutory right, including victimisation claims in sex, race
or disability discrimination
– Being pregnant or giving birth
– Certain health and safety activities
– Qualifying for or seeking to rely on the minimum wage
– Being a part-time worker
– Activities as an elected employee representative or candidate for that role
– Taking part in an employee representatives election for Tupe/trade union
consultation
– Spent convictions
– Taking leave for family reasons in emergencies
– Making a protected disclosure under whistleblowing legislation
– A medical suspension requirement or recommendation (qualifying period here
one month).

This is a not an exhaustive list.

It is also easy to make mistakes in calculating an employee’s length of
service for unfair dismissal purposes, such as failing to:

– Add on the week’s statutory minimum notice to the termination date in
calculating the "effective date of termination" where the employment
ends summarily but gross misconduct has not occurred
– Count contractually agreed periods of prior service
– Count previous service where a Tupe transfer has taken place
– Recognise that employers who deliberately break continuity but agree with the
employee that he or she should start work at some predetermined date in the
future could unintentionally be giving eligibility for unfair dismissal.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contractual damages

Some employees with coming up to a year’s service have also recently been
able to claim contractual damages for the loss of a chance to claim unfair
dismissal, in circumstances where the contractual notice period would have
taken them over a year and the employer was contractually obliged to follow,
for example, a disciplinary procedure, but did not. A tribunal recently awarded
an employee contractual damages for loss of earnings (beyond the payment in
lieu) and even for loss of statutory rights.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
West end theatre workers in dispute over pay and hours
next post
Could you hack it as a homeworker?

You may also like

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+