Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Reasonable adjustmentsDisability discriminationCase lawDisability

Duty to make reasonable adjustments not triggered when no indication of return to work

by Jessica Smith 19 Mar 2015
by Jessica Smith 19 Mar 2015 Does the employer need to take reasonable adjustments if there is no prospect of the employee returning to work? Stock photo.
Does the employer need to take reasonable adjustments if there is no prospect of the employee returning to work? Stock photo.

In DLA Piper’s latest case report, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not triggered where the employee had given no indication that she would be fit to return to work.

Duty to make reasonable adjustments

Is an employer breaching the Equality Act 2010 if it fails to make adjustments for a disabled person?

Podcast: Duty to make reasonable adjustments

Tailored reasonable adjustment agreement for an employee with a disability

Doran v Department for Work and Pensions

Facts

Ms Doran was employed by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) as an administrative officer. Her employment began in May 2009 and her initial fixed-term contract was extended until 4 November 2010.

In January 2010, Ms Doran was signed off work with stress. Initially, Ms Doran provided a sick note and asked whether part-time hours could be considered in the future. This was followed by a further sick note in February 2010 that made no mention of a possible return to work.

In accordance with the DWP’s attendance policy, Ms Doran attended a meeting with her line manager to discuss her absence. They told her that she could be offered administrative assistance duties and part-time hours for four weeks to support her return.

Ms Doran agreed that she would discuss this with her doctor. However, she did not discuss the issue with the DWP again.

Under the DWP’s attendance policy, absences would not be supported if there was no indication that the employee would be able to return to work within six months. On this basis, DWP dismissed Ms Doran on the grounds of capability on 26 May 2010.

Ms Doran brought various claims against DWP in the employment tribunal, including a claim that it had failed to make reasonable adjustments under s.4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.

Although this case was determined under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as the relevant legislation at the time, it is important to note that the reasonable adjustment provisions in the Equality Act 2010 are the same.

Employment tribunal decision

At first instance, the employment tribunal indicated that a phased return to work could not be implemented until Ms Doran had indicated that she was going to return to work.

The employment tribunal pointed out that the DWP had discussed a phased return or returning to work at a lower grade at first, but the ball was in Ms Doran’s court in terms of discussing these suggestions with her GP and reverting to the DWP, which she did not do.

EAT decision

On appeal, the EAT held that the employment tribunal had been entitled to find that the duty to make reasonable adjustments had not been triggered because Ms Doran did not become fit to work even if reasonable adjustments could be made to her employment.

The EAT went further and also agreed that it was for Ms Doran to tell her employer when she became fit to do any work. Ms Doran’s appeal was therefore unsuccessful.

Implications for employers

The decision that Ms Doran was found to have responsibility for informing her employer when she would be able to at least do some work may not sit comfortably with all employers. The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Employment statutory code of practice highlights that it is good practice for an employer to ask a disabled employee about any potential adjustments that could be made or should be considered.

On this basis, employers should still be proactively managing employee absence, checking on progress during periods of leave, discussing when employees will be fit to return to work whether or not any reasonable adjustments should be considered. It is also important to ensure that any proposed adjustments are agreed with the employee before they are actually implemented.

However, it is worth being aware that, strictly speaking, for an employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments to be triggered, there needs to be an indication that the employee may be fit to return to work at some point.

Avatar
Jessica Smith

Jessica Smith is an associate at DLA Piper.

previous post
Few surprises for employers in pre-election Budget
next post
Occupational health research: tips on conducting surveys

You may also like

How employers can support women during the HRT...

13 May 2022

EHRC: Not all long Covid cases amount to...

10 May 2022

Solicitor unfairly dismissed during cancer recovery awarded £17k

6 May 2022

School discriminated against Christian caretaker who tweeted against...

3 May 2022

Steep rise in employment tribunal claims over neurodiversity...

2 May 2022

Disability pay gap wider than in 2014

29 Apr 2022

Avoid salary history questions in recruitment, guide urges

29 Apr 2022

Philosophical belief: barrister’s tribunal claim against Stonewall begins

26 Apr 2022

Disabled worker discriminated against by hot-desking policy

21 Apr 2022

Flexible working could unlock jobs for 1.3 million...

4 Apr 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+