Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Civil ServiceLatest NewsHR practicePay & benefitsPensions

Early retirement for civil servants is cost effective, says Cabinet Office

by Daniel Thomas 26 Oct 2010
by Daniel Thomas 26 Oct 2010

The Cabinet Office has insisted that offering civil servants early retirement on full final-salary pensions in exchange for giving up a lump-sum redundancy payout will prove a cost effective way of cutting staff numbers.

Under planned changes to the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, an estimated 80,000 Whitehall staff, as well as thousands more in police forces, the NHS and councils, will be given the opportunity to retire at the age of 50 on full pensions.

The move was described as “outrageous” by pensions expert Ros Altmann, who suggested it would have worked out cheaper to keep these staff on the payroll, while John Philpott, chief economist at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development said it was “the last hurrah for the public sector”.

Reports suggested that some highly paid civil servants will end up taking home more if they get their pension straight away rather than leaving with a lump-sum redundancy payout.

But a spokeswoman for the Cabinet Office said that the cost of providing a pension will only exceed the value of the compensation payment in a limited number of cases.

“Only in those cases where a person has not only reached their minimum pension age but also has very significant periods of service will it attract costs in excess of their compensation payments,” she told Personnel Today. “We would not expect staff in this limited group to form a large proportion of those who will leave.”

The spokeswoman added that the current scheme “is no longer fit for purpose” and is unaffordable.

“For instance, at present those being made redundant would also receive an increased pension which can add more than two years’ salary to the cost of the redundancy,” she said. “Under the proposed new scheme this will no longer be the case and a person will receive their pension accrued to the point they leave.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Earlier this month, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude announced that the 18-month long negotiations over redundancy terms in the Civil Service Compensation Scheme had concluded after five of the six civil service unions agreed a deal, which specified that the maximum payout should be 21 months’ salary. The Government had previously offered a cap of 15 months’ pay.

However, two of the unions said that Maude had jumped the gun, while the Public and Commercial Services union – which won a High Court challenge to the previous Labour Government’s attempts to change the scheme – insisted that the new offer was still unacceptable.

Daniel Thomas

previous post
Impact of voluntary accreditation for OH providers
next post
Smartphone breakthrough to revolutionise employee safety

You may also like

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

Hospitality loses jobs at ‘staggering’ rate since Budget

26 Aug 2025

Charities increasingly relying on ‘shadow’ volunteer workforce

26 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Employee Experience Award

26 Aug 2025

Law firm immigration caseloads up 40%

26 Aug 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

22 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise