Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Company carsLatest NewsPay & benefits

Employers face safety concerns with cash-for-car schemes

by Ross Bentley 12 Jul 2005
by Ross Bentley 12 Jul 2005

Employees who have opted out of company car schemes in favour of ‘cash for car’ programmes may be using unsafe vehicles for business.

This could result in employers facing legal action resulting from any employee car-related death or personal injury.

Car fleet management company Masterlease says about one-quarter of business drivers on the road had opted out of company schemes, leaving their bosses with no way of checking the safety and suitability of the vehicles they now use for business.

Drawing on figures from the latest NOP Automobile Survey, Masterlease said more than 50% of existing opt-out drivers chose secondhand cars and, of this figure, 22% went for used cars that were more than three years old.

These statistics, Masterlease argued, set a worrying trend in terms of a company’s duty of care.

“Companies should simply say ‘no’ to employees who want to use their own vehicles for business unless the business has in place rigorous tests to examine the cars’ suitability and road-worthiness,” said Masterlease managing director Garry Hobson.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

He said government plans to “come down hard” on businesses that flaunt the duty of care regulations under its proposed corporate manslaughter legislation was another reason to look at company car policies.

Opt-out schemes are also bad news for companies wishing to promote a green agenda, according to Masterlease. It found 72% of opt-out drivers also choose specialist vehicles with larger, more polluting engines as their next car compared with 54% of executive car drivers who remain in company schemes.

Ross Bentley

previous post
Tribunal ruling means harassers liable for compensation
next post
Asda’s management shake-up frees cash for shopfloor jobs

You may also like

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Poundland avoids collapse as restructure approved

27 Aug 2025

London hotel housekeepers call off strike action

27 Aug 2025

Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain...

27 Aug 2025

Indeed launches platform aimed at healthcare workers

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise