Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

Employers who contact staff at home could face legal action

by Personnel Today 24 Aug 2001
by Personnel Today 24 Aug 2001

Employers have been warned not to telephone staff
at home because they could be sued for invasion of privacy.

The Institute of Management has published a
leaflet informing its 89,000 members that under the Human Rights Act, managers
risk legal action if they contact their staff outside work hours unless employees’
contracts state that home calls are acceptable.

A manager may be able to argue that the
monitoring of an employee’s phone or e-mail is reasonable if employees have
been told that such behaviour is a disciplinary offence and checks are
necessary to detect breaches of company regulations, according to the IM.

The publication of the leaflet follows the
introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 which became law in the UK in October
last year.

But Dominic Johnson,
head of employment relations at the CBI, thinks there are occasions when
employers have a legitimate right to contact their staff at home.

He said, “There is no
case law which demonstrates the act prohibits employers contacting employees at
home. Of course employees’ privacy should be respected. But there are occasions
when the needs of the organisation must come first.”

“That is not to say the
CBI supports unnecessary or inappropriate intrusions. But at times of
organisational crisis or, for instance, where an employee is absent without
explaining why, it is quite legitimate to contact them.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

www.inst-mgt.org.uk

Karen Higginbottom

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
TUC calls for more bank holidays for UK employees
next post
Beards are bad for business, claims survey

You may also like

Security officer who showed ‘racist’ video wins £44k...

18 Aug 2025

CEO pay at record levels for third year...

18 Aug 2025

Scottish government faces legal action over gender policies

18 Aug 2025

More than 56k potential candidates for each HR...

18 Aug 2025

Alan Turing Institute faces toxic culture accusations

18 Aug 2025

4,000 jobs at risk as ministers decide not...

15 Aug 2025

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

Lidl to increase entry-level hourly pay for 35,000...

15 Aug 2025

Job losses likely as Kingsmill announces deal to...

15 Aug 2025

AI in learning still ‘potential not reality’, according...

15 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise