Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployee relationsEmployment lawCase lawEmployment tribunals

Employment lawyers: ‘tribunals effective and judges top of their game’

by Ashleigh Webber 4 Feb 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 4 Feb 2021 Karen Jackson, founder of Didlaw, one of the lawyers to talk to Daniel Barnett
Image: Daniel Barnett/YouTube
Karen Jackson, founder of Didlaw, one of the lawyers to talk to Daniel Barnett
Image: Daniel Barnett/YouTube



Video: Daniel Barnett / YouTube

Solicitors and barristers have said the suggestion by The Times newspaper that some employment judges are inexperienced is ‘idiotic’ and have sought to assure tribunal users that the system is an effective way of resolving employment disputes.

In the video posted on employment barrister Daniel Barnett’s YouTube channel, employment law experts criticised The Times’ reporting earlier this week and reassured claimants and employers awaiting legal proceedings that employment tribunal judges are experienced and neutral.

Jeremy Scott-Joynt, a barrister at Outer-Temple Chambers, said: “’Inexperienced’ is an idiotic word to use when we’re taking about employment lawyers with two or three decades of experience. Every judge has to start somewhere.”

Didlaw managing director Karen Jackson said: “These are people who are at the top of their game. These are people who have worked in employment law for, some of them, decades.

“They may not have sat as judges, but they’ve sat in the tribunal, they’ve brought hundreds of cases before the tribunal and they know the law inside out… to suggest they’re inexperienced is frankly insulting.”

They refuted the article’s claim at employment tribunal judges had made a “power grab” by suggesting that discrimination claims should be heard by them, rather than in the crown courts.

“As a specialist discrimination solicitor I think it’s a really good idea for a single equality court,” said Audrey Ludwig, head of legal services at the Suffolk Legal Centre. “In practice the employment tribunal judges hear equality cases week in week out and therefore their expertise in the Equality Act is much higher than the county court [judges].”

Barrister Chris Milsom of Cloisters added:  “The idea that this is a power grab propelled by ego rather than principle, which is what that seems to suggest, is completely misguided.”

The Times article also alleged that tribunals were reluctant to strike out discrimination cases that had no prospect of success and heard evidence deemed to be irrelevant. The employment law experts said this simply was not true.

Scott-Joynt said: “Discrimination cases are complex. They largely rely on inference and difficult evidential points and if you kick them out without a hearing, the chances of injustice are really high.”

Barnett concluded the video by assuring employers that the tribunal system was not “stacked against them”, as the article suggested.

“It’s important to set the record straight. The employment tribunal system, whilst chronically underfunded, and whilst suffering at the moment from a real backlog in cases, is not staffed by inexperienced judges; is not hearing cases extended in length because judges don’t know how to handle them; and is actually a working and effective place to get employment disputes resolved,” he said.

Legal sector HR opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more HR opportunities in the legal sector

 

 

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor of OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
Storage and logistics key to maintaining trust and confidence in Covid vaccines
next post
Labour calls for ‘smarter’ furlough for as long as needed

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Examiner was worker, not self-employed, finds tribunal

30 May 2023

English nationalism is not a philosophical belief, says...

22 May 2023

Covid-resignation driving examiner to have tribunal claim reheard

19 May 2023

Embryologist unfairly dismissed after whistleblowing

18 May 2023

How ‘quiet layoffs’ could result in tribunal claims

11 May 2023

Law firm partner fined £45k for lewd song

10 May 2023

£3m award for unfairly dismissed Isle of Man...

4 May 2023

MPs call for Employment Bill in King’s Speech

21 Apr 2023

Trade union officer was not an employee, EAT...

18 Apr 2023

Worker unfairly dismissed following offensive Facebook posts

13 Apr 2023

  • The HR Bundle: Your one-stop guide to building a successful global HR Department PROMOTED | Get your hands on Deel’s free HR bundle...Read more
  • The Benefits of an Employee Assistance Programme PROMOTED | EAPs support employees in a range of ways...Read more
  • Intergenerational working and how to manage up and down the generations PROMOTED | The benefits and challenges of intergenerational workplaces...Read more
  • Bereavement in the workplace: How training can help HR get it right PROMOTED | HR professionals play an essential role...Read more
  • UK workforce mental wellbeing needs PROMOTED | The mental wellbeing support employers are providing misses the mark...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+