Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment tribunals

Employment tribunal shake-up needed to improve quality and efficiency

by Mike Berry 23 Jul 2010
by Mike Berry 23 Jul 2010

A radical overhaul of employment tribunal procedures is required as HR professionals contend with a rising tide of claims from disgruntled employees.

The warning comes from the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA), which conducted research among its 5,500 members to gain a grass-roots view of what is happening.

There has been a massive hike in the number of claims accepted by employment tribunals in the past year. The 56% rise reported by the Tribunals Service for 2009-10 is the highest-ever level, involving 236,100 claims, up from 151,000 the previous year.

The soaring claims rate provides the backdrop to mounting concern among employment lawyers throughout the UK about the consistency of the approach, efficiency and quality of tribunal services. Problems cited include: short notice of postponement of substantive hearings; delays in listing case management discussions and pre-hearing reviews; and cases going part-heard because of lack of available time.

More than half (56%) of respondents had experienced a decline in service received from tribunals. Eight in 10 believed the approach taken by tribunals around the country was not consistent; the same number believe a lack of resources lay behind the problem.

Three-quarters favoured the creation of specialist courts to deal with equal pay claims – which has led to the service creaking under pressure as it struggles to deal with the huge number of claims.

Other changes suggested by ELA members include:



  • judges sitting alone on straightforward cases, such as unfair dismissals, to ease overall pressure on the system;
  • having an agreed timetable and process for exchange of witness statements; and
  • more use of email communication from tribunals to cut down on phone calls and post.

ELA chair Joanne Owers said: “The dramatic escalation in claims has put employment tribunals and the Tribunals Service under considerable pressure. It is understandable that cracks are appearing in the system.

“In addition to highlighting the problem areas commonly encountered by users, ELA members have indicated very strong support for practical changes and improvements, which they believe will complement the work being carried out to improve the service and deliver significant benefit to the employees and employers who use it.”

Avatar
Mike Berry

previous post
HR news round-up: HR stories making the headlines 23 July 2010
next post
CIPD chief Jackie Orme forced to apologise after quango report blunder

You may also like

Bald move: Tribunal was right in sex-related harassment...

17 May 2022

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Employment tribunal: use of word ‘bald’ can amount...

13 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

MP seeks legal protections for employees undergoing fertility...

9 May 2022

Solicitor unfairly dismissed during cancer recovery awarded £17k

6 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022

Woman wins £15k payout following director’s treatment during...

5 May 2022

Steep rise in employment tribunal claims over neurodiversity...

2 May 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+