Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Public sectorAge discriminationPensions

Firefighters claim pensions age discrimination

by Personnel Today 13 Jan 2017
by Personnel Today 13 Jan 2017 Photo: Medicimage/REX/Shutterstock
Photo: Medicimage/REX/Shutterstock

Firefighters have challenged the Government and fire service employers on the introduction of the 2015 Firefighters’ Pension Scheme at an employment tribunal hearing that began this week.

Firefighters under 45 years of age on 1 April 2012 were compulsorily transferred into the new scheme in 2015.

More XpertHR resources

Age discrimination

What procedure should an employer follow if it wants to retire an employee?

Top tips on avoiding discrimination when managing older workers

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) claimed that the new scheme requires members to work for longer and to pay more into the pension fund, only to receive a pension that is greatly reduced in value.

Test cases of five firefighters were brought on behalf of the employees affected.

In addition to age discrimination, the claimants say the scheme discriminates on the basis of race and gender, as a disproportionate number of women and ethnic minority firefighters are affected by the changes.

The FBU claims the new pension arrangements also raise safety concerns where firefighters will likely work until a later age, but still be required to undertake physically demanding operation tasks.

Sean Starbuck, FBU national officer, said: “This is an extremely important case for us. We have always said that the 2015 scheme was unworkable and did not reflect the job that firefighters actually do.

“The Government simply ignored the evidence we presented and imposed the scheme anyway. We identified areas where we thought younger firefighters were being discriminated against and took up this challenge.”

A number of pensions challenges are currently working their way through employment tribunals and the courts, including a case by High Court judges on the reduction of their pensions.

Penny Cogher, pensions lawyer at Irwin Mitchell LLP, said: “The political climate is such that unions are now more likely to openly challenge the Government by bringing these types of claims.”

She continued: “In the private sector, the battle over maintaining defined-benefit pensions has usually already been lost except in the area of privatised industries whose pension benefits are protected by statute.

“In the private sector, often the message to the workforce is, no pay rises for all workers while the pension deficit has to be paid off, even for workers who have no residual defined-benefit pension benefits.

“It would be harder, I think, for these workers to bring the reverse age discrimination case against their employers and private-sector employers tend not to have such deep pockets as the Government.”

Qian Mou, employment law editor at XpertHR said: “Age-related requirements in retirement schemes are often justified on the basis of workforce planning and financial necessity.

“In the current case, it appears that the new pension scheme was introduced primarily with a view towards long-term costs. Costs alone have often been found to be insufficient to justify a discriminatory practice, so it will be interesting to see how the employment tribunal deals with this in a case with potential public safety implications.”

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Adobe shares “Check-in”, its annual appraisal replacement
next post
Could “associate EU citizenship” become a worthwhile employee perk?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Skills passport and new qualifications for care workers...

11 Aug 2022

Personnel Today Awards 2022 shortlist: Health and Wellbeing...

10 Aug 2022

Nurses set to vote on strike over pay

9 Aug 2022

Liz Truss: Diversity jobs cull but U-turn on...

2 Aug 2022

Police ‘let down’ by ministers with insufficient pay...

28 Jul 2022

Government launches DB pension long-term funding consultation

26 Jul 2022

Public sector pay: Unions angry at below-inflation rises

20 Jul 2022

MoD reveals zero-tolerance approach to sexual misconduct

20 Jul 2022

Women over 50 hesitant to progress due to...

19 Jul 2022

AI recruitment systems to be investigated over discrimination...

14 Jul 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+