Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

HR practiceSickness absence

Fit-notes will cause arguments about ‘suitable work’ definition

by Daniel Thomas 2 Feb 2010
by Daniel Thomas 2 Feb 2010

The government’s new fit note strategy will “inevitably” lead to disputes between employers and staff about what constitutes suitable work following a period of sickness absence, HR chiefs have warned.

Under the new fit note system, which comes into effect in April, GPs will not be asked to determine whether a worker is 100% fit to return to work. Instead, the onus will be fully on employers to conclude what a patient who is declared ‘may be fit for some work’ could or could not do at work.

But Linda Maughan, HR director at Middlesbrough Council, told Personnel Today: “If the employer is left to determine suitable work with only a ‘fit for some work note’ and a diagnosis, then those without Occupational Health advice may struggle and there will inevitably be disputes about what constitutes suitable work.”

She added: “If GPs were going to give an idea of activities that could be undertaken, or those which should be avoided, then this could be very helpful,” she said

The fit note asks doctors to list whether the employee would benefit from a phased return to work, altered hours, amended duties or workplace adaptations. However, GPs are not required to go into detail about exactly what a worker could do related to their original job role.

Gillian Hibberd, corporate HR director at Buckinghamshire County Council, said the intention for employers to take responsibility for rehabilitating wokrers was good, but added: “I am concerned that the changes will create more chaos. I can see a situation where employees will object to what is asked of them by their employers.”

Stephen Moir, corporate people director at Cambridgeshire County Council, warned that the culture change the new system will require from GPs cannot be underestimated. “I’d want some assurances about the actions to be taken to support implementation, otherwise the changes could easily lose credibility quickly,” he said.

This point was taken up by Amanda Harris, head of HR at The Institute of Ismaili Studies, who said GPs would need additional training. “It is unclear how the GP could feel confident making decisions about partial fitness to return to work without a detailed understanding of what the employee’s role entails,” she warned.

Ben Willmott, senior public policy adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development – which is currently conducting research with the British Occupational Health Research Foundation into the capability of line managers in managing the return to work of long-term absentees – was more positive about the changes.

“It’s not going to be a sudden process, but, over a period of years, we expect this to lead to more people returning to work than would have done under the previous system,” he said. “It will provide a framework to encourage GPs to have a conversation about a phased return to work, prompting the employee to speak to their employer.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Mary Canavan, HR director at the British Library, said employers should already be stepping in when employees have been off sick for a period of time, using attendance policies, employee assistance programmes and Occupational Health to identify how the employee may be assisted and supported back into work.

“This dovetails in with how employers assess reasonable adjustment and DDA requirements,” she added.

Daniel Thomas

previous post
Fujitsu dispute goes to Acas as company suspends compulsory redundancies
next post
Smoking ban extension will include workplace entrances

You may also like

Number of Neet women rises but figures fall...

23 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Period pain and absence harm women’s pay and...

13 May 2025

Two-thirds of school leaders suffering mental ill health

6 May 2025

Employers struggling to manage rising levels of sickness...

7 Apr 2025

Employers failing to tell cancer carers of their...

31 Mar 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

Postman working second job while sick was unfairly...

25 Mar 2025

What do HR specialists enjoy most about their...

21 Mar 2025

UK is only advanced economy where economic inactivity...

20 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+