Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawConstructive dismissalEmployment contracts

Gibbs v Leeds United: £330k for football club’s breach of contract

by Gurpreet Duhra and Germaine Cowen-Machin 26 Jul 2016
by Gurpreet Duhra and Germaine Cowen-Machin 26 Jul 2016 Chris Dorney / Shutterstock
Chris Dorney / Shutterstock

The High Court held that the presence of commercial exit discussions between a football club and an assistant manager during which he stated that he was prepared to leave did not prevent the club from committing breach of contract. Gurpreet Duhra and Germaine Cowen-Machin explain this employment case, in which the High Court made an award of more than £330,000.

Breach of contract cases in football

Farnan v Sunderland Association Football Club Ltd

Williams v Leeds United Football Club Ltd

McBride v Falkirk Football & Athletic Club

Macari v Celtic Football and Athletic Co Ltd

Gibbs v Leeds United Football Club Ltd

Facts

The claimant, Nigel Gibbs, was employed as assistant manager at Leeds United Football Club under a fixed-term contract.

He had joined the club in April 2013 as assistant manager to Brian McDermott, with whom he had worked in a similar role at several other football clubs previously.

In May 2015, following Brian McDermott’s departure from the club, the claimant met with the club to discuss the future of his own position.

Although there was a discussion about the claimant taking on the role of head coach, he indicated that he would not be interested in this role and suggested that his loyalties lay with Brian McDermott.

However, he did not state that he intended, or expected to, leave the club to follow Brian McDermott to wherever he might go next.

The claimant was subsequently issued with a letter confirming that he was to remain in his role as assistant manager. He was asked to return to work with immediate effect, despite the fact that he had historically always been given holiday at the end of the football season.

The claimant complained about this, which prompted various discussions regarding his potential exit from the club. Although the claimant admitted that he was open to the possibility of leaving, negotiations broke down when a financial exit package could not be agreed.

A few days later, David Hockaday was announced as the club’s new head coach. Following his appointment, the claimant’s duties were gradually eroded.

The claimant was excluded from football staff meetings, was not invited to participate in the club’s first team training and was given no instructions as to what he should do.

Additionally, he was not issued with his usual training schedule, nor was he instructed to accompany the first team to a pre-season friendly. When the claimant requested a training kit for the forthcoming season, he was issued with the previous season’s kit instead.

Matters came to a head when the claimant received an email from the club stating that, with immediate effect, his role was to be restricted to working with the club’s junior and other non-first team members. The email made it clear that the claimant would have no involvement with the first team.

Three days later, the claimant resigned and he subsequently commenced legal action against the club in the High Court.

High Court decision

In defending the claim, the club alleged that the claimant had intended to leave all along, citing the various discussions that had taken place between the parties.

However, the court did not accept that this was relevant to the issue of liability. The court confirmed that the issue to be determined was whether or not the club was in breach of its contract with the claimant, and whether or not that breach was repudiatory and the claimant resigned in response to it.

The court held that the claimant had been constructively dismissed. It was held that, by requiring the claimant to have no contact with the first team, the club had shown that it no longer intended to be bound by the claimant’s contract of employment, and that this amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract.

The court was satisfied with the claimant’s evidence that the email restricting his role to that of non-first team players prompted his resignation, particularly as this was supported by the proximity in time between the two events. Notably, it suggested that the conduct of the club would have amounted to breach of contract, even without the presence of that email.

In the court’s view, the fact that the claimant had expressed that he was prepared to leave the club was “beside the point” and was not in itself a breach of contract, nor did it prevent the future conduct of the club from being a breach.

A key point for the court was that the claimant had remained ready and willing to fulfil his contractual duties.

The club also argued that the claimant had unreasonably failed to mitigate his losses by rejecting a post-dismissal offer to return to the club as head coach. However, the court held that the club’s behaviour towards the claimant had made it untenable for him to return.

Implications for employers

This case provides a reminder that the existence of commercial exit discussions between parties does not prevent a breach of contract.

Care should be taken not to replace or undermine the role of an employee before such exit terms have been agreed and signed off by way of a settlement agreement.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Otherwise, employers run the risk that, if negotiations break down, they may be faced with constructive dismissal claims.

Even where a parting is amicable or an employer is confident that an exit will be agreed, it is easy to see how employees could use such a situation to their advantage, by using the threat of litigation to negotiate a more favourable exit package.

Gurpreet Duhra and Germaine Cowen-Machin

Gurpreet Duhra is employment partner and Germaine Cowen-Machin an associate at DLA Piper.

previous post
Will shared grandparental leave help or hinder employers?
next post
RBS sets gender diversity targets above Davies recommendations

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

2 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+