Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Gig economyEmployment contractsFreelance workers

Gig economy: Addison Lee courier was worker

by Stephen Simpson 3 Aug 2017
by Stephen Simpson 3 Aug 2017 Photo: Richard Gardner/REX/Shutterstock.
Photo: Richard Gardner/REX/Shutterstock.

An employment tribunal has found that an Addison Lee courier was a worker and not an independent contractor, in the latest decision on the employment status of individuals working in the gig economy.

The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB) won the employment status case against taxi and courier company Addison Lee.

The employment tribunal ruled that the company was wrong to classify courier Christopher Gascoigne as self-employed, rather than as a worker.

Gig economy: case law

Aslam and others v Uber BV and others

Dewhurst v CitySprint UK Ltd

Boxer v Excel Group Services Ltd (in liquidation)

The decision is the latest in a string of employment cases revolving around the “gig economy”.

In these cases, individuals taken on by gig economy companies purportedly on a self-employed basis argue that they are in fact workers.

The classification of an individual as a “worker”, as opposed to “self-employed” is important. Workers are entitled to some basic employment rights, including the right to holiday pay and the national minimum wage.

Reacting to the judgment, IWGB general secretary Jason Moyer-Lee said: ““As if we needed any more evidence, today’s judgment once again proves our point. The law is clear and employers in the so-called ‘gig economy’ have been choosing to unlawfully deprive their workers of rights.

“Yet another domino has fallen with regard to the inevitable conclusion that people in the so-called ‘gig economy’ are workers.”

However, an Addison Lee spokesman responded: “We note the tribunal’s verdict, which we will carefully review. Addison Lee is disappointed with the ruling as we have always had, and are committed to maintaining, a flexible and fair relationship with cycle couriers.

“This is a single judgment based on one pushbike courier and the circumstances of his particular relationship with Addison Lee in March 2016.”

Shaun Hogan, associate at law firm Stevens & Bolton, assessed the wider implications of these cases for employers: “This comes hot on the heels of the Taylor Review, which made a number of recommendations to clarify worker status and deal with so called ‘platform workers’ in the gig economy.

“Employers should take care and reconsider how they classify those who work for them. It will become vital to make allowances for holiday pay and compliance with the national minimum wage, especially in light of the recent decision by the Supreme Court that tribunal fees are unlawful.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“As a result employers may well see a rise in the number of claims lodged by workers in respect of their employment status.”

The IWGB is also awaiting a decision from the Central Arbitration Committee over the employment status, for collective bargaining purposes, of individuals working for food delivery company Deliveroo.
relx_copyright – This article is Brightmine content – Copyright 2024 LexisNexis Risk Solutions

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
FTSE 100 CEO pay falls by a sixth
next post
Sedentary middle-aged office workers’ health at risk

You may also like

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

22 Aug 2025

Are firms turning to self-employed contractors to avoid...

7 Aug 2025

Home Office agrees deal with food couriers to...

23 Jul 2025

Zero-hours employees may have to request guaranteed hours

17 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Why bosses must set pay independently

2 Jul 2025

Employee ownership rockets in past decade

25 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise