Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyLatest NewsEmployment tribunalsRedundancy

HR professionals reveal their fears over making employees redundant

by Adam McCulloch 7 Mar 2025
by Adam McCulloch 7 Mar 2025 Photo: Shutterstock
Photo: Shutterstock

Legal risk and the prospect of employment tribunal claims are the main concerns of organisations when making redundancies, not the loss of skills.

New data from HR and employment law specialist WorkNest found that more than half (54%) of organisations say their main area of doubt when making a redundancy is “legal risk and potential tribunal claims”.

This was significantly higher than worries about the reputational risk to the business (4%), the financial implications of redundancy payments (5%) and the loss of skills within the company (9%).

Collective redundancy

Tribunal uplifts for ‘fire and rehire’ code breaches to take effect

Why a fair redundancy cannot rely on cost-saving alone

Impact of Employment Rights Bill published as consultations launched

Many HR professionals also said they had fears over the impact on workplace culture after making redundancies. More than a quarter (27%) said that the repercussions of job losses on the remaining employees’ morale and productivity was their primary concern.

Ensuring compliance with the legal process when making job cuts was also found to be the most stressful part of making redundancies (27%) – with stress fuelled by the fear of legal action. The same number, however, (27%) reported that supporting employees emotionally was actually the toughest part of the process.

Peter Holmes, senior employment law adviser at WorkNest, said: “Our data shows that, currently, the main reason businesses will need to make redundancies is to cut costs.

“However there’s many reasons businesses may look to make redundancies including restructuring or trying to future-proof the organisation. Whatever the reason, it’s a difficult process for everyone involved and brings with it a broad spectrum of concerns as highlighted by our research.

“Getting the correct advice and support is key to easing the stress and worry of a tribunal threat, especially in more complex redundancy situations. The correct processes, support systems and investing in line manager training are good ways to try and minimise the impact job losses have on remaining employees.”

About 500 HR professionals were polled by WorkNest.

Fears over a rising tide of redundancies have been raised because of the rise in employers’ national insurance from this April.

The financial risks to firms of getting redundancy processes wrong are set to become greater. The government has confirmed it will table an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill to double the maximum protective award from 90 to 180 days’ pay where an employer fails to comply with collective redundancy obligations, for example, in fire and rehire situations.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Lower socio-economic background graduates ‘overlooked’ in hiring
next post
Migrant care workers exploited for thousands

You may also like

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

Top 10 HR questions June 2025: Redundancy consultation

2 Jul 2025

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Allianz to cut 650 jobs in the UK

19 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

Redundancies boost candidate availability at fastest pace since...

13 Jun 2025

20,000 employees agree to leave Volkswagen by 2030

5 Jun 2025

Volvo to cut around 3,000 roles in restructure

27 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+