Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawMaternity

Human resource practitioners believe maternity pay is too low

by Mark Crail 8 Oct 2007
by Mark Crail 8 Oct 2007

Most humna resources (HR) practitioners believe that statutory maternity pay (SMP) is set at too low a level, according to research by Personnel Today’s sister publication, Employment Review.

The survey of 185 practitioners found that six in 10 (60%) thought SMP should be raised, while just one respondent argued that it was already too high. A further four in 10 (39%) thought it was about right.

SMP has been improved substantially over recent years. Women who qualify are entitled to payment for 39 weeks. Payment is set at 90% of the woman’s average earnings for the first six weeks, falling to £112.75 a week (or remaining at 90% if that is a lower figure) thereafter.

The government originally promised to raise SMP entitlement to 52 weeks by the end of this parliament. But for many women, taking time off work to have a baby still entails suffering a significant drop in earnings.

The survey found that nearly half (46%) of the organisations taking part in the study had made changes to their maternity pay or maternity leave arrangements over the previous 12 months.

Of these, nearly three out of four (72%) had made changes to reflect improvements in SMP, which came into effect on 1 April 2007. The remaining one in four (28%) had introduced enhanced levels of maternity pay or made improvements to existing schemes.

…and six out of 10 employers pay above statutory rate

Most employers (59%) already have maternity pay schemes that offer more than the statutory minimum, the Employment Review survey shows.

Although larger organisations and those in the public sector are significantly more likely to improve on statutory maternity pay (SMP), either by paying at a higher rate altogether, or by paying the existing higher rate for a longer period – a practice that is already widespread among employers of all types and sizes.

The survey found that nine in 10 (90%) public sector employers currently pay more than the SMP requirement to their employees. This falls to 53% of services companies in the private sector, and to 50% of manufacturing firms.

About half of small (51%) and medium-sized (53%) employers pay more than SMP requires, but the figure rises to 78% of organisations with 1,000 or more employees.

Many of the largest employers are public sector organisations, and it seems likely that it is this, rather than the size of the organisation, that accounts for the difference.

Trade union recognition is also a factor, with 72% of employers that recognise a union also offering enhanced maternity pay, falling to just 47% of those that do not recognise a union.

…but there can be strings attached

The survey shows that nearly half (45%) of the organisations that offer enhanced maternity pay expect the woman to repay at least part of it if they decide not to return to work at the end of their maternity leave.

Most commonly, those that attach conditions to enhanced maternity pay expect the employee to return to work for at least three months if they are to escape a penalty.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Two employers in the survey – one a law firm, the other a food retailer – expect women to return for at least a full year after their maternity leave, or else repay elements of their enhanced maternity pay.

For more information, go to www.xperthr.co.uk

Mark Crail

Mark Crail worked on XpertHR from 2001 until 2020, most recently as content director. He led the salary survey and HR data benchmarking services, overseeing the collection and publication of pay data through the Job Pricing tool and its wider HR research programme which forms the core of XpertHR Benchmarking.

previous post
Russell Martin, human resources director of Norwich Union, talks to Personnel Today about offshoring
next post
Personnel Today Awards – RAA Sprague Gibbons Employer Branding Award

You may also like

P&O Ferries boss who steered 800 sackings steps...

29 Aug 2025

Council clerk sacked after trying to ensure his...

29 Aug 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Employment Law Firm...

20 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise