Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

In on the act: New regulations and fixed term employees

by Personnel Today 23 Jul 2002
by Personnel Today 23 Jul 2002

Our continuing series of guides to major employment legislation puts key
information at your fingertips and brings you up to date with the latest
developments. This week Marcus Rowland, a partner at Kemp Little, provides an
overview of the soon to be introduced regulations prohibiting less favourable
treatment of employees on fixed-term contracts

The regulations

The Government has recently announced its intention to bring the Fixed-Term
Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 into force
on 1 October 2002.

The aim is to prevent employers treating employees on fixed-term contracts
less favourably than similar permanent employees and to impose limits on the
use of successive fixed-term contracts.

When implemented, the regulations will give fixed-term employees the
following rights:

– Not to be treated less favour-ably than comparable permanent employees
unless the treatment can be objectively justified

– To be informed of any "available vacancies" so that they have
the opportunity to secure permanent employment

– To be regarded as employed on a permanent contract after they have been
continuously employed on successive fixed-term contracts for four years unless
certain conditions are satisfied

– To receive written reasons for any suspected less favourable treatment
within 21 days of making a request

– To bring a claim for compensation to an employment tribunal for any breach
of the regulations, and to claim automatic unfair dismissal if they are
dismissed for exercising their new rights

In addition, the regulations will repeal the sections in the Employment
Rights Act 1996, whereby fixed-term employees may waive their right to receive
a statutory redundancy payment. This will apply to contracts signed, extended
or renewed after the regulations come into force.

Which employees are covered by the regulations?

Unlike the regulations relating to part-time workers, the regulations only
apply to employees. Agency workers, emp- loyees on apprenticeships or
government training schemes and students on work placements of up to one year,
are specifically excluded.

The individual must also be employed on a contract which is for a specific
term or which terminates automatically on the completion of a specific task or
upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of a specific event.

Who is a comparable permanent employee?

When deciding the question of whether a fixed-term employee has been treated
less favourably, it is necessary to compare his treatment with that afforded to
a comparable, permanent employee.

This is defined as an individual employed on a permanent contract by the
same employer who works or is based at the same establishment as the fixed-term
employee and who is engaged in the same or broadly similar work having regard,
where relevant, to whether they have a similar level of qualification, skills
and experience.

If there is no such permanent employee at the same establishment, the
fixed-term employee is entitled to compare himself with someone based at one of
the employer’s other establishments.

What amounts to less favourable treatment?

It was initially thought that the regulations would not apply to pay and
pensions on the basis that these fell outside the scope of the EC Fixed-Term
Work Directive.

However, the Government has decided that the regulations will go beyond the
requirements of the directive and prohibit pay and pensions discrimination.

Therefore, a fixed-term employee will be able to bring a claim under the
regulations if he receives inferior terms – such as a lower rate of pay or less
generous benefits – than a comparable permanent employee unless the employer is
able to justify the difference in treatment on objective grounds.

The regulations provide the following specific examples of what will
constitute less favourable treatment:

– Requiring fixed-term employees to accrue a longer period of service to
qualify for benefits

– Not providing fixed-term employees with the same training and permanent
employment opportunities

When will less favourable treatment be justified?

Importantly, the regulations provide that when looking at the question of
whether a fixed-term employee receives less favourable treatment in relation to
any term of his contract, it is necessary to look at the package as a whole,
rather than the individual terms.

Therefore, it will be permissible to deny a fixed-term employee certain
benefits provided that his overall package is just as good.

Although this provision is sensible, there is obviously scope for dispute
over the issue of whether the overall package is comparable in the event that
fixed-term employees are offered different benefits to permanent employees.

Information about available vacancies

Since one of the aims of the regulations is to make it easier for employees
on fixed-term contracts to move into permanent employment, they contain a
provision requiring employers to inform all fixed-term employees of
"available vacancies" in the establishment where they work. This may
be done by including the vacancy in an advertisement which the employee has a
reasonable opportunity of reading, or giving notification in some other way.

Key points

From October 2002, unless different treatment can be justified, ensure that
fixed-term employees receive:

– the same overall package as comparable permanent staff

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– access to the same training and permanent employment opportunities

– information about available vacancies

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Companies having easy time recruiting e-talent
next post
Is boardroom door still closed to HR?

You may also like

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+