Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Last straw over issue of constructive dismissal

by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2001
by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2001

Staff
do not have to resign at the first sign of trouble to claim constructive
dismissal, the EAT has ruled.

The
case of Abbey National v Robinson, EAT, 20 November 2000, has added a whole new
dimension to the law relating to constructive dismissal. In certain
circumstances, an employee is now entitled to claim constructive dismissal
almost a year after the breach of contract by the employers. 

Constructive
dismissal has always been a potent weapon in an employee’s arsenal, enabling
such an employee to take the initiative and manage his or her own exit policy.
Section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 states that there is a
dismissal where the employee terminates the contract "in circumstances in
which (the employee) is entitled to terminate it without notice by reason of
the employer’s conduct". 

For
the purposes of section 95(1)(c) such conduct must involve a repudiatory breach
of contract by the employer and the employee must react immediately or as soon
as possible thereafter. Failing this, he or she may be deemed to have waived
the repudiatory breach and affirmed the contract, thereby losing the right to
claim constructive dismissal.

Facts
of the case

From
1996 onwards, Robinson was repeatedly bullied and harassed by her line manager,
resulting in a formal complaint in April 1997. In credit to Abbey National, the
complaint was investigated and disciplinary action was taken against the
manager concerned, the intention being to move the manager into another
department.

In
June 1997, however, while Robinson was on sick leave as a result of stress
caused by the manager’s actions, she was informed that the manager was not to
be moved. She attended a meeting in August 1997 to discuss her return to work
but was offered no alternative employment and consequently remained
disillusioned, frustrated and unwell resulting in a further period of sick
leave. 

Almost
a year later, a further meeting was held after which Robinson concluded that
she was never going to be offered an alternative position by Abbey National.
After receiving two letters from Abbey National’s personnel department, one
offering her alternative employment and one in- forming her that it was no
longer available, she decided that this was the "last straw" and
resigned on 26 July 1998, bringing a claim for unfair constructive dismissal.

Abbey
National did not dispute the fact that Robinson was entitled to resign and
claim constructive dismissal but alleged that such a claim should have been
brought in August 1997 and not more than a year later. Such argument was based
on existing authorities at the time, including the leading case of Western
Excavating (ECC) v Sharp, CA 1978, ICR 221, in which the Court of Appeal held
that any resignation on the grounds of constructive dismissal must take place
soon after the conduct complained of and any delay could constitute affirmation
of the contract.

EAT’s
finding

The
Employment Appeal Tribunal found that Abbey National’s failure to move the
manager concerned and failure to offer Robinson alternative employment was the
start of the breakdown in the relationship of trust and confidence that
eventually led her to resign. Such breakdown continued throughout the following
year as a result of Abbey National’s unreasonable and insensitive treatment of
Robinson and culminated in the contradictory letters received from the
personnel department. 

Conclusion

Employees
will now not be forced to decide whether to jump ship and claim constructive
dismissal at the first sign of a breakdown in the relationship of mutual trust
and confidence for fear of a finding that any delay would constitute
affirmation of the contract, and can afford the employer the opportunity to
repair any damage done and make amends.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Failure
to take such steps by the employer will constitute the last straw. This is an
extremely important case in a familiar area of employment law.

By
Mark O’Neil, senior associate in employment law at Sinclair Roche &
Temperley, 020-7452 4224

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Are you a young turk or old fogey?
next post
Telecoms firms suffer from HR weaknesses

You may also like

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

Over 1,000 UK redundancies expected at G4S Cash...

14 Jul 2020

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+