Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment contracts

Legal opinion: Can the Conservatives tamper with the Agency Workers Regulations?

by Personnel Today 12 Apr 2010
by Personnel Today 12 Apr 2010

What scope would a new Conservative government have to tamper with the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, due to come into force on 1 October 2011?

Background

A working person can generally be categorised as an employee, worker or an agency worker, and until recently the agency worker was the last in the queue when handing out employment rights.

Until the Agency Workers Regulations came along, that is. The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 have filtered down from the European Union and into UK law via the Temporary Agency Workers Directive, to give agency workers similar rights to those employees enjoyed.

The regulations also have penalties for agencies and hirers who fail to give agency workers their rights under this new law.

The huge burden these laws will create for UK employers can only be lightened by agreements made in consultation with “social partners”, according to the EU directive.

In the UK, these are the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and Trade Union Congress (TUC).

In consultation with the government, TUC and CBI agreed agency workers would have to complete 12 continuous calendar weeks in the same role to qualify for equal treatment.

The EU has given member states until 5 December 2011 to put in place national laws that will comply with the provisions of the directive.

The government’s response has been seen in the Agency Workers Regulations, due to come into force on 1 October 2011.

Conservative objections

The Conservatives have objected vocally to the speed with which these regulations have progressed through parliament.

They fear the government is under increasing pressure from trade unions, prompting it to rush through the legislation after only eight weeks of consultation with businesses.

They also believe the regulations will be self defeating as they will discourage end- users from hiring agency workers, cutting off a vital method of getting back into work following the economic downturn.

This suggests that, should the Conservatives win the general election, they would aim to tweak the Agency Workers Regulations to lighten the burden placed on the employer, while encouraging agency work.

But what powers would a Conservative government have to change these regulations? They are law across Great Britain already, and the run-up to their coming into force on 1 October 2011 is designed to allow agencies and hirers to adapt their working practices.

The Conservatives say they will “reduce the burden of red tape which stifles employers – particularly small businesses.” This would be no small task. It is not a case of amending draft papers and furthering debate in parliament, but repealing the legislation (or at least sections of it) to reduce the burden on employers.

The Conservatives could not simply ignore the directive, and fail to implement some or all of the EU law, without suffering more marginalisation in Europe. Our economy, burdened as it is with national debt, could barely afford the possible reprisals.

Conservative MP Jonathan Djanogly wrote in the Conservative Blue Blog, “we need to cut out the gold plating of European directives, repatriate employment law from Brussels to the UK”. This statement hints at withdrawing, at least partially, from the EU, which seems an extreme measure in response to one set of regulations. It is doubtful even the most vociferous of Eurosceptics would advocate this action.

The only realistic option open to a new Conservative government would be to reopen consultation with the TUC and CBI, in the hope that a new agreement could be reached that reduced the burden on business.

The historical relationship between the TUC and Conservative party would not encourage businesses to hold out hope that such an agreement could be easily reached.

The TUC is greatly in favour of the new regulations and could see any proposed changes by the Conservatives as protecting unscrupulous employers at the expense of agency workers.

The CBI is likely to be far more responsive to amending the regulations to lighten the burden on businesses. So there may be some scope for a new government to come to an agreement with the social partners.

Time is short and the volatile combination of a new Conservative government and the social partners would be under considerable pressure to have a new set of regulations in force by 5 December 2011, especially if they intend to allow agencies and hirers time to adapt their current practices.

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Employee Assistance Professionals Association: New note is fit for purpose
next post
Online job vacancies including HR continue upwards trend

You may also like

Include NHS bank staff in one-off payments, petition...

1 Jun 2023

Examiner was worker, not self-employed, finds tribunal

30 May 2023

Holiday pay changes: how entitlement will be simplified

26 May 2023

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

26 May 2023

Non-compete clauses and proposed limits on their duration

12 May 2023

How are working time records changing in the...

12 May 2023

Changes to working time, TUPE and non-competes announced

10 May 2023

Government urged not to backtrack on Worker Protection...

2 May 2023

EU law bill set to stall as unions...

28 Apr 2023

High Court halts full nurses’ strike

27 Apr 2023

  • The HR Bundle: Your one-stop guide to building a successful global HR Department PROMOTED | Get your hands on Deel’s free HR bundle...Read more
  • The Benefits of an Employee Assistance Programme PROMOTED | EAPs support employees in a range of ways...Read more
  • Intergenerational working and how to manage up and down the generations PROMOTED | The benefits and challenges of intergenerational workplaces...Read more
  • Bereavement in the workplace: How training can help HR get it right PROMOTED | HR professionals play an essential role...Read more
  • UK workforce mental wellbeing needs PROMOTED | The mental wellbeing support employers are providing misses the mark...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+