Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawMaternityRedundancy

Legal Opinion: Redundancy and maternity leave

by Melissa Paz 5 Oct 2010
by Melissa Paz 5 Oct 2010

Employers often believe that it is unlawful to make a woman redundant during maternity leave.

The recent case of Simpson v Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd emphasises that, not only is this a misconception, but the right of a woman on maternity leave to suitable alternative vacancies is not automatic. It also proves that, sometimes, the correct reading of legislation is reassuringly obvious.

The case concerned Regulation 10 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999, which states that, if it is not practicable by reason of redundancy for an employer to continue to employ a woman on maternity leave, the employee is entitled to be offered (not just invited to apply for) a suitable available vacancy with her employer (or an associated employer). This gives the woman priority over other employees who are at risk of redundancy, even if they are better qualified for the job.

Key points

  • An employee who is made redundant while on maternity leave is entitled to be offered (not just invited to apply for) a suitable available vacancy with her employer (or an associated employer).
  • An alternative vacancy must be both suitable and appropriate for the woman to do in the circumstances, and the terms and conditions must not be “substantially less favourable”.
  • Employers should ensure that they have evidence of why they consider a new role is not “suitable and appropriate” and document their reasoning in case their decision is challenged.

Regulation 10

Regulation 10 states that this right to a vacancy depends on two conditions:

  • the work to be done must be both suitable for the woman and appropriate for her to do in the circumstances; and
  • the terms and conditions of her new job, including the capacity and place in which she is to be employed, must not be “substantially less favourable”.

In this case, Endsleigh closed down several branches, including Mrs Simpson’s place of work in London, while she was on maternity leave. During the redundancy consultation process she was invited to apply for a position in Cheltenham. She failed to apply, claiming that the relevant correspondence had piled up at her home while she was recuperating elsewhere. In her claim, she argued that she should have been offered the new role in Cheltenham.

Maternity and redundancy

Redundancy rights on maternity leave

Endsleigh accepted that the new position was suitable for Mrs Simpson, but argued that it was less favourable to her in relation to its terms and conditions – eg, she would have to relocate and do a seven day shift. Therefore, it argued that there was no obligation to offer her the post.

The employment tribunal held that Mrs Simpson had not been unfairly dismissed. She appealed.

Right to an alternative vacancy

Rather optimistically, Mrs Simpson argued that, if there was a suitable post, this should have been offered to her even if the terms and conditions of the contract were less favourable. Unsurprisingly, given the use of the word “and” between the two conditions in Regulation 10, the EAT decided that the two conditions on the right to an alternative vacancy should be read together, and both needed to be satisfied.

The EAT also confirmed that the question of the job’s suitability was one for the employer and there was no requirement that the employee be involved in this process. While the employer would have to consider what it knew about the employee’s personal circumstances and work experience, it was up to the employer, knowing what it did about the employee, to decide whether or not a vacancy was suitable.

While this decision provides welcome clarification for employers, they should still consider alternative vacancies in these circumstances very carefully – suitability and favourableness will not always be clear cut. In this case, the fact that the new role was in a different location was sufficient to render it “substantially less favourable”, but one can envisage situations in which this might not be the case (eg, if the new location were more easily commutable).

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Employers should ensure that they have evidence of why they consider a new role is not “suitable and appropriate” and document their reasoning in case their decision is challenged. Ultimately, the stakes remain high – if an employer breaches Regulation 10 and then dismisses the employee on maternity leave, the dismissal will be automatically unfair.

Melissa Paz, solicitor, Withers LLP

Frequently asked questions from XpertHR
  • Does an employee made redundant while on maternity leave have any special rights?
  • Where a redundancy will take effect before a woman goes on maternity leave is she entitled to preferential treatment with regard to being offered suitable alternative employment?
  • If a pregnant employee is made redundant before commencing maternity leave can her employer pay her statutory maternity pay in one lump sum?
Melissa Paz

previous post
Cyclescheme presents a positive solution for Cycle to Work participants and employers
next post
Bosses lack key leadership qualities, HR study suggests

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+