Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

NHSLatest NewsDismissalEmployment contractsEmployment tribunals

Nurse may be entitled to enhanced redundancy payment, finds EAT

by Ashleigh Webber 31 Jul 2023
by Ashleigh Webber 31 Jul 2023 The claimant worked at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Vivid Brands / Shutterstock.com
The claimant worked at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Vivid Brands / Shutterstock.com

A nurse may have been entitled to a more favourable redundancy payment when the NHS moved her to a different post during a restructuring exercise, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has found.

Senior haematology research nurse Miss Jackson, who worked for the University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust from 2010 to 2019, was in a role graded at band 6. However, following a restructuring process which saw a reduction in the number of band 6 roles in research and development, she was slotted into a band 5 role on a lower salary and with different terms and conditions.

She refused to agree to the new terms and conditions, and submitted several grievances including concerns with the way the process had been managed.

Redundancy

What to do when making staff redundant

Redundancy errors businesses must avoid

Redundancies: How to conduct a fair redundancy process

She suggested the band 5 post was not suitable alternative employment because it was a generic role that did not require specialist skills, however the NHS rejected this.

Jackson resigned, however she later withdrew her resignation after the NHS trust upheld her grievance appeal, finding that the band 5 role could not be considered a suitable alternative. She was told if she withdrew her resignation she would be given eight weeks’ notice of termination and during that time the organisation would consider if any alternative roles were available.

There was a dispute over when the eight weeks’ notice period began, with the claimant arguing it should be applied retrospectively from when she received the letter informing her that she would be placed in a band 5 role. The NHS trust disagreed, so Jackson reinstated her resignation and said she considered the situation constructive dismissal.

The trust said that Jackson had forfeited her entitlement to both statutory and contractual redundancy pay because she had left before the expiry of her notice.

An employment tribunal in 2021 upheld Jackson’s complaint of unfair dismissal and her claim for statutory redundancy pay, but rejected her breach of contract complaint which related to entitlement to contractual redundancy pay under the terms of the NHS ‘Agenda for Change’ pay and grading system.

The Agenda for Change terms state that redundancy should be calculated on the basis of one month’s pay for each complete year of service. In the claimant’s case this was £36,644.

The contract also states that NHS employees forfeit their redundancy pay if they leave employment before their notice period expires, unless an earlier release has been agreed.

Jackson appealed the tribunal’s decision, arguing that it should have considered her situation to be similar to that seen in Hogg v Dover College – a case involving a teacher whose job was changed, resulting in a pay cut and amounting to unfair dismissal. This would mean that she would be entitled to the enhanced contractual redundancy pay under Agenda for Change, she said.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the employment tribunal did not properly apply the law when considering Jackson’s case.

The judgment says: “The ET needed to do a proper before-and-after comparison of the band 6 post and the band 5 post to ascertain whether the new terms were of sufficient difference to amount to a withdrawal of one contract and its replacement by another.

“On its own findings, this was not a variation of an existing contract but the withdrawal of one and the imposition of another.”

The judge directed that the case be reheard by another employment tribunal.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The judgment added: “To be clear, the remission does not reopen the question of whether the dismissal was fair or unfair (it was unfair) or whether the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy (she was); it only concerns the claimant’s entitlement to a contractually enhanced redundancy payment. The parties have agreed that, if there was a Hogg dismissal on 3 December 2018, the claimant is entitled to the enhanced sum, subject to the jurisdictional cap of £25,000.”

HR Director opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more HR director jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Nigel Farage: Diversity and inclusion under fire in the guise of ‘woke’ banks
next post
Senior executives want to make more of HR’s role in business

You may also like

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Allianz to cut 650 jobs in the UK

19 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

Redundancies boost candidate availability at fastest pace since...

13 Jun 2025

20,000 employees agree to leave Volkswagen by 2030

5 Jun 2025

Volvo to cut around 3,000 roles in restructure

27 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+