Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

StressEmployment lawWellbeingOccupational Health

Night shift fears: employers on alert

by Personnel Today 3 Apr 2009
by Personnel Today 3 Apr 2009

The Danish government has awarded compensation to about 40 women who have developed breast cancer after working long spells of night shifts.

What impact will this have on employers in the UK?

The UK government does not provide a similar state compensation fund. Until it does, employees will have to pursue claims against their employers.

The Danish decision has absolutely no impact on the British legal system.

It needs to be determined whether there is a medical link between developing cancer and working long hours and nightshifts. But a forthcoming Health and Safety Executive epidemiologist report was commissioned to deal with this issue. We await its findings.

Exposure at work

If such a link is found to exist, then employees will have to bring claims similar to those where workers have suffered disease or illness following exposure at work to noxious substances, such as asbestos.

Over the past 10 years, the civil courts have seen an increase in compensation claims for industrial disease, instigated by employees who have developed asbestos related diseases. These claims are being brought against former employers of up to 20 years ago or more (or often their insurer). Although the dangers of working with asbestos were known as early as the 1960s, some employers did little to protect their employees.

These industrial disease claimants have been successful because their employer should have known about the risks to employees’ health that asbestos posed, but took no action to prevent or reduce employee exposure. If the risk of injury is reasonably foreseeable, and the employer takes no reasonable course of action to limit, minimise or remove the risk, then it is likely that they will be liable for negligence or breach of statutory duties.

Similarly, if the courts conclude that it is a reasonably foreseeable risk that making employees work night shifts may cause cancer, and the employer continues to subject its staff to that risk, they too may find themselves liable for damage caused.

Employers have an obligation to take ‘reasonably practical’ precautions towards the health of staff – they do not have a duty to eliminate all risks. As a starting point, employers should take practical steps to protect night shift staff, such as ensuring there are regular shift patterns and/or split night shifts, minimising back-to-back night shifts which can result in disturbed sleep patterns.

When deciding whether an employee should be awarded compensation, the courts will need to consider expert medical evidence on whether working night shifts was the cause of any damage. Employers are likely to defend such claims on the basis that they did not know and could not have known about the risks and this argument is likely to prevail.

Medical evidence

Compensation claims rest on the question of causation, which is a matter for medical evidence. Claimants may well struggle to establish a causal link between working night shifts and the onset of cancer, in which case their claims will fail.

Time and extensive medical research will tell whether a causal link exists between developing cancer and working long shifts. Until then, employers should ensure they carry out stringent health checks and comply with their duties under the comprehensive Health and Safety legislation.

We are still a long way off the absolution of night shifts altogether and, if they are as dangerous as some fear, it could prove a serious problem for employers to which there will be no easy solution.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Key points



  • Danish courts have awarded compensation to women who developed breast cancer after working night shifts.
  • The HSE has commissioned an epidemiologist report on the issue.
  • Employers have an obligation to take ‘reasonably practical’ precautions towards the health of staff; they do not have a duty to eliminate all risks.
  • Employers should make stringent health checks and comply with their duties under Health and Safety legislation.

Personnel Today

previous post
Publishing senior council officers’ pay will deter applicants, warns expert
next post
Judge orders stockbroker firm to stop poaching staff

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Uncertainty over law hampering legal use of medical...

20 May 2025

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

Awareness weeks fuel spike in demand for mental...

19 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Healthcare workers prioritise mental health support in new...

12 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today