Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Case lawEmployment law

O’Hanlon v HM Revenue & Customs, Employment Appeal Tribunal, 4 August 2006

by Eversheds HR Group 5 Sep 2006
by Eversheds HR Group 5 Sep 2006

No duty to increase sick pay for disabled employee
O’Hanlon v HM Revenue & Customs, Employment Appeal Tribunal, 4 August 2006

Background

Mrs O’Hanlon was employed by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). She had a disability that caused long absences from work. Although she received full pay for the first six months of sick leave, subsequent absences were paid at a reduced rate. O’Hanlon brought a claim under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA), arguing for full pay for all her absences.

The employment tribunal accepted that O’Hanlon was disadvantaged by the sick-pay rules because she was more likely to have long absences than someone without a disability. This meant that HMRC was under a duty to make reasonable adjustments. But the tribunal did not think it reasonable to expect HMRC to give full pay to O’Hanlon whenever she was off sick, particularly in view of the cost implications if it were expected to do the same for other disabled employees. The tribunal also decided that there had been no disability-related discrimination, but that even if they were wrong about this, any discrimination was justified. Therefore, there had been no breach of the DDA. 

Appeal

On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) agreed with the tribunal that, although O’Hanlon was disadvantaged by the sick-pay rules, there was no duty on the employer to increase her sick pay. The EAT did, however, accept that the tribunal had been wrong to say there was no disability-related discrimination. The reason O’Hanlon received less than full pay was because she was absent for more than six months and the absence was caused by her disability. But because the discrimination was justified for economic reasons, the tribunal’s decision was upheld.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Comment

This case clears up some of the uncertainty caused by earlier cases. A disabled employee will now find it very difficult to claim full pay during sick leave (once any contractual entitlement to full pay has been exhausted) unless the employer has caused the absence by failing to make reasonable adjustments which would have enabled the employee to remain in work.

Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Skills crisis exacerbated by failure to train staff
next post
Whitehall HR failings let sacked staff off the hook

You may also like

MPs reject Lords’ amendments to Employment Rights Bill

16 Sep 2025

Judge in Supreme Court ruling said he’d ‘take...

15 Sep 2025

Employment lawyers voice AI fears on tribunal claims

15 Sep 2025

Day one rights to make 86% more cautious...

14 Sep 2025

Employment Rights Bill U-turn unlikely, say legal experts

10 Sep 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

10 Sep 2025

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

‘Terrible’ Employment Rights Bill returns to Commons

4 Sep 2025

New ‘failure to prevent fraud’ law a ‘game-changer’

2 Sep 2025

Business confidence grows to post-Budget peak

1 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise