Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyLatest NewsDismissalEmployment contractsEmployment tribunals

P&O Ferries’ redundancy obligations: Legal Q&A

by Adam McCulloch 28 Mar 2022
by Adam McCulloch 28 Mar 2022 Photo: Shutterstock
Photo: Shutterstock

Tim Tyndall, employment partner at Keystone Law, reflects on the P&O Ferries redundancy controversy, telling Adam McCulloch that some facets of the government’s response to the 800 job losses have been ill-informed.

AM: Have there been any comparable cases that you know of?

TT: It happens more often than it should, but not on this scale. An employer might look at a business unit or individual and take a view that the cost of continuing employment is greater financially or in terms of disruption, than it would be for a commercial settlement, which takes into account the massively increased exposure to statutory claims. It’s not an approach that can be condoned legally or in terms of presentation for the reasons now so evident in the damage to P&O’s reputation.

Does this episode make UK employment laws look somewhat powerless?

Our laws are not powerless, but are certainly weaker than say France or Germany where, in essence, a dismissal has to have official approval before it is valid. Here, P&O has been able to price in the cost of its admitted flagrant breach of employment law. It is the availability of that “pricing in”or “taking a view” as an option that should be the subject of serious re-examination.

What did you make of the government’s response?

The government’s initial approach, echoed by the PM in the Commons, failed to recognise the changes made in the Seafarers (Transnational Information and Consultation, Collective Redundancies and Insolvency Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018, which were signed off by the then transport secretary Chris Grayling and with no visible objection from trades unions.

Collective redundancies

Redundancies expose legal anomalies surrounding P&O Ferries redundancies

‘Are you just a shameless criminal?’ MPs grill head of P&O Ferries

‘Government must take over P&O Ferries services’

Collective redundancies

The government, including the PM, the attorney general and the transport minister, have threatened legal proceedings without thus far identifying what form they might take, which suggests that they recognise that the Seafarers Directive’s implementation by the UK’s statutory instrument is defective.

Is Brexit a factor?

It should be emphasised that this is not an EU issue but an outcome of the UK’s implementation of the directive. The law changes referred to might correct this anomaly, but it’s difficult to see how they can be applied retrospectively.

Might the former employees benefit from pursuing claims in employment tribunals?

The admissions by P&O in front of the business and transport committees last week that it intentionally broke the law when it did not consult with the unions, presents an open-and-shut case to the employees who wish to pursue compensation in the UK employment tribunals. However, if they decide to take this route, it will take many months for the amount of compensation to be determined. The compensation offered by P&O in the settlement agreements might be more commercially attractive than the prospect of drawn out proceedings against an organisation with an apparently fragile economic future.

Will the P&O crews gain from fines levied against their former employer?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

There remains a dispute as to who was entitled to be told of the planned dismissals, be it the UK authorities or those where the ships were registered. That issue will not help the employees. Any legal action the government takes or fines it imposes will not help the P&O employees or put money in their pockets. The money will end up with the chancellor.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

P&O Ferries
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
NHS programme reduces Type 2 diabetes diagnoses by 7%
next post
Covid prevalence research highlights ‘choice’ in health outcomes

You may also like

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Apprentice with ADHD was fairly dismissed after lunch...

10 Apr 2025

Ben & Jerry’s accuses Unilever for sacking boss...

20 Mar 2025

Top 10 HR questions February 2025: Supporting employees...

4 Mar 2025

Up to 74,000 women forced out of work...

27 Feb 2025

Countess of Chester NHS chair resigns after damning...

17 Feb 2025

Officer fairly dismissed for not disclosing previous sacking...

11 Feb 2025

Balloon worker’s sex discrimination claim falls flat

7 Feb 2025

Met Police inspector sacked over WhatsApp messages

13 Jan 2025

Post Office fired and rehired IT staff on...

23 Dec 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+