Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployment tribunalsHolidays and holiday payMinimum wageSick pay

Post Office postmasters seek worker status ruling

by Ashleigh Webber 3 Jun 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 3 Jun 2021

More than 100 postmasters and sub-postmasters are taking the Post Office to an employment tribunal in a bid to be recognised as ‘workers’, which would give them rights such as holiday pay and sick pay.

The case, Baker and Others v Post Office Ltd, will be heard at the London Central Employment Tribunal later this month and will consider whether the claimants, who run Post Office franchises, should be classified as “workers” rather than self-employed.

The claimants are set to argue that the Post Office has a degree of control over the work they do, which means they are dependent on the Post Office and so their status is incompatible with self-employment.

This was one of the arguments relied upon in the landmark Uber BV and Others vs Aslam and Others case. In February, the Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers are workers, not self-employed, because Uber has significant control over the way drivers work and sets the terms and conditions of using its service, among other reasons.

The outcome in the Post Office case could have implications not just for those involved in the class-action claim, but for the thousands of sub-postmasters across the UK.

Lead claimant Mark Baker, who runs a Post Office in Wiltshire, told the Financial Times that many postmasters receive less than the national minimum wage. Dealing with a parcel, for example, would generate just 38p in pay, he said.

Recent worker status rulings

Addison Lee drivers are workers, Court of Appeal confirms

Supreme Court: Uber drivers are workers

“A postmaster earns nothing unless he sells something. You could stand there all day and not sell anything and commission rates are very low,” said Baker.

A spokesperson for the Post Office said: “We take the issues to be discussed at a forthcoming employment tribunal very seriously. We want to resolve them and are working hard to find potential solutions that are relevant to today’s Post Office and can satisfy the interests of all our postmasters.

“As part of the overall group reset, we’re giving a bigger voice to postmasters, which will help us meet their needs, and two current postmasters have been appointed non-executive board directors, enabling them to directly influence strategy.”

“Post Office’s new management is focused on resetting our relationship with postmasters and addressing the past issues relating to remuneration. To date this has included increasing annual postmaster remuneration by £27m over the past year and average remuneration across our network of 11,500 branches is up 7% against last year.

“We recognised the impact Covid-19 was having on postmasters’ ability to stay open and serve their communities, which is why last year we guaranteed all independent postmasters received 100% of their remuneration in April, 90% of their remuneration in May, topped up variable remuneration in June and set up a hardship payment for those that needed immediate relief.”

In its annual report, the Post Office flagged up the outcome of the employment tribunal as a potential concern.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In April, 39 postmasters wrongly prosecuted by the Post Office over alleged fraud, as a result of issues with the Horizon IT system, had their criminal convictions overturned. A compensation claim on behalf of those who have had their names cleared has been launched.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

post-office
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Call to bolster PPE standards to protect health staff
next post
Most businesses reject pure profit in favour of ethical stance

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

Menopause claims triple in two years, tribunal figures...

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+