Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

MaternityLatest NewsPregnancy and maternity discriminationEmployment tribunalsMaternity and paternity

Pregnant worker given fewer shifts was discriminated against

by Ashleigh Webber 8 Mar 2023
by Ashleigh Webber 8 Mar 2023 Image: Shutterstock
Image: Shutterstock

A woman who was offered fewer shifts and later dismissed because of her pregnancy has been awarded more than £15,000 for unfair dismissal and discrimination. 

Ms McKnight was told she would receive her P45 when she asked her employer, bar and restaurant operator WBI, about arrangements for maternity leave.

Her dismissal was never confirmed by the Greenock-based company, and her attempts to contact her manager and the firm’s HR representative following the birth of her son were unsuccessful.

McKnight started working as a barperson at the Word Up bar and nightclub in Greenock, Inverclyde, in November 2021. Later that month, she accepted an assistant manager role at Fenwick 47, a tapas restaurant owned by the same company.

Maternity and pregnancy discrimination

Maternity protection bill steps closer to becoming law

Former Lacoste manager succeeds in discrimination claim at appeal

Maternity discrimination: How to best support returning employees

McKnight never received a written statement of employment particulars as required by the Employment Rights Act 1996, so she was unsure who her employer was. The employment tribunal in Glasgow determined that WBI, which operates both businesses, was her employer.

She informed restaurant manager Mr Carruthers of her pregnancy in January 2022. She was due to have the baby in September and planned to begin her maternity leave in August.

In February 2022 she experienced pain and sickness connected with her pregnancy. She informed Carruthers of this  but was largely able to work her usual hours.

From the end of March 2022 she noticed she was getting fewer shifts than before, and in mid April she found she was not put on the rota at all despite confirming her availability to work. She was offered one further shift in May.

In May 2022 she contacted the firm’s HR representative, Ms Penman, to discuss her plans for taking maternity leave. Penman told her she had been “P45’d” in a way that suggested any conversation about maternity leave would not take place. McKnight took this to mean she had been dismissed.

She asked Carruthers for clarification, stating that if her sickness had been an issue she would have obtained a note from her GP. He replied by saying, “no hard feelings”. The next message McKnight received from Carruthers was in September 2022, congratulating her on the birth of her son.

McKnight’s attempts to contact Carruthers and Penman after this were unsuccessful.

Tribunal’s decision

The employment tribunal found McKnight had suffered a detriment and treated unfavourably because of her pregnancy by offering her fewer shifts and not engaging with her properly in relation to her maternity leave and pay.

It found her pregnancy was the reason for her dismissal. Although she had not been employed by the company for the two-year qualifying period, dismissal for this reason constitutes automatically unfair dismissal.

She was awarded £15,956.40 in compensation, including a £9,900 award for injury to feelings.

Commenting on the case, Sharokh Koussari, partner at law firm Axion DWFM, said: “This judgment has many interesting aspects but in particular it serves as a reminder of the extra care that employers must exercise when dealing with maternity and pregnancy issues.

“It is clear that in this particular case some basic supportive procedures were lacking: WBI failed to take some usual steps such as allocation of shifts, arranging maternity leave, and confirming maternity pay arrangements. This behaviour by the employer was qualified by the tribunal as unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy in accordance with the Equality Act.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“To make things worse, measures were taken by the employer which were found to constitute detriment pursuant to the Employment Rights Act. This included the further discrimination of Ms McKnight by her being offered fewer hours of work than normal because of her pregnancy or pregnancy-related illness.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Union recommends local authority workers reject pay offer
next post
Prerana Issar appointed chief people officer at Sainsbury’s

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

M&S unfairly dismissed pregnant bakery worker

29 Apr 2025

Recruiter who returned to empty office after maternity...

23 Apr 2025

Former Citibank employee settles sex discrimination case

28 Mar 2025

Up to 74,000 women forced out of work...

27 Feb 2025

Property consultant with morning sickness awarded £94k after...

18 Feb 2025

Mothercare discriminated against employee on maternity leave

16 Dec 2024

Administrator sacked for maternity leave pregnancy wins £29,000

28 Oct 2024

EHRC opens consultation on updated code of practice

2 Oct 2024

‘Emotional’ pregnant Mitie manager wins £350k in compensation...

11 Sep 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+