Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Prepare for demise of the fixed-term contract

by Personnel Today 14 Nov 2000
by Personnel Today 14 Nov 2000

New rulings giving greater rights to fixed-term contract workers should prompt employers to review their policies

The fixed-term contract has been a useful part of the employment repertoire. Often it is entirely appropriate and suits everyone – for example, a hiring to cover maternity leave.

To support this, the law allowed the parties to agree that, when the fixed term expired, the worker would not sue – after all, he knew the score when he started.

But things were to turn sour. Lured by the ability to exclude liability, some employers insisted that work more appropriate for a permanent contract should be done on a fixed-term basis.

This left those involved without job security or adequate protection. Inevitably the courts,

Government and now the EU have reacted to this abuse. We must now ask whether the demise of the fixed-term contract is imminent.

The first nail was hammered into the coffin by the House of Lords in 1983, when it held that the practice of breaking continuity of service for fixed-term workers by inserting breaks between the terms would fail, unless a break was substantial.

The Government hammered in another nail in October 1999, when it outlawed the practice of getting fixed-term workers to sign away unfair dismissal rights. Now, the employer must have a good reason for not renewing.

The third, and perhaps final, nail will be hammered home by June 2001, when the Fixed Term Contracts Directive is implemented in the UK. This will

prohibit an employer from unjustifiably treating a fixed-term worker less favourably than a permanent worker.

Employers will have to consult workers’ representatives over the use of fixed-term contracts. The Government may cap the number of times a fixed-term contract can be renewed.

Combine these aspects with the obvious disadvantages of a fixed-term contract – that, without good reason or an appropriate break clause, early term- ination will result in a claim for damages – and you wonder whether there is any point.

There is some point. The directive will allow less favourable treatment of some types of fixed-term workers, such as apprentices, and here at least this type of contract may have a future

Otherwise, advantages are more marginal. Those on fixed-term contracts of more than two years can still agree not to claim a redundancy payment, but statutory redundancy payments are modest. Equally marginal is the fact that it may be easier to defend an unfair dismissal claim on the non-renewal of a fixed term than on the termination of a permanent contract.

Employers should now be reviewing their use of fixed-term contracts and adopting a clear policy on them. Benefits packages should be brought into line with permanent contracts.


Key points


– The Fixed Term Contracts Directive should come into force in the UK by June 2001.

– When the Directive is in force employers will have to treat fixed-term workers no less favourably than their permanent counterparts.

– Employers will have to consult with workers’ representatives on the use of fixed-term contracts

– Benefits packages for fixed-term workers should be as favourable as those for permanent workers.

– Employers should review the future use of fixed-term contracts and whether those employed under them should become permanent workers. A clear policy on the use of fixed-term contracts is advisable.

By Nicholas Moore, partner and head of employment with law firm Osborne Clarke OWA, which has offices in the City of London, Bristol and the Thames Valley

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Grassroots call for a more political CIPD
next post
Grassroots call for a more political CIPD

You may also like

Grants scheme set up to support women’s health...

16 May 2022

How music can help to ease anxiety at...

9 May 2022

OH will be key to navigating ‘second pandemic’...

14 Apr 2022

OH urged to be aware of abortion consultations...

8 Apr 2022

How coached eCBT is returning the workplace to...

8 Apr 2022

Why now is the time to plug the...

7 Apr 2022

Two-thirds of shift workers feel health affected by...

18 Mar 2022

TUC warns of April Covid risk assessment ‘confusion’

14 Mar 2022

Consultation on new NHS cancer standards, as waits...

11 Mar 2022

Pandemic pivot to home working fuelled mental ill...

11 Mar 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+