Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Received, but understood?

by Personnel Today 1 Jul 2002
by Personnel Today 1 Jul 2002

Howard Popeck reviews the online assessment tool Cognisco Series-300

Litigation from external sources or disgruntled employees is on the
increase. To merely claim that the litigant had been presented with the rules,
safety procedures, employment guidelines, HR policies, and so on is no longer a
credible defence. The most commonly asked question in court is: "Yes, but
how do you know that they understood the information they were presented
with?"

Onerous board-level responsibilities

Consider the implications of increased legal responsibility placed on board
directors by compliance regulations where the current blurred distinction
between information and knowledge is likely to come under increasingly rigorous
scrutiny.

Two global companies keen to identify what their staff actually understand
about job-related information are working with the UK-based HR data analysis
firm Cognisco, using its Cognisco Series-300 which provides online assessment
and detailed ongoing analysis of individual employees’ levels of understanding.

Avoiding lucky guesses

Cognisco’s claimed raison d’etre is that it is able to identify employees
who meet or exceed a competence benchmark primarily through memory
(questionable understanding), against those who achieve similar or better
grades by demonstrating sufficient understanding, for example, with only
limited reliance on memory. Moreover, it spots the ‘lucky bluffers’, who give
the correct, but guessed answers, it claims.

Where is the evidence?

At first sight Cognisco’s claims appear extravagant. Yet senior HR people at
two giant organisations, Interbrew (37,000 people worldwide) and Toms
Confectionery (£110m turnover) believe the UK findings might ultimately
influence their entire global HR policies.

Interbrew UK uses it to provide online assessments within its sales function
competency framework, providing accurate measurements of the levels of
understanding by senior level sales managers and directors. This fits within
the early stages of a rolling strategy to harmonise competencies on a global
basis for Interbrew. In the global arena, accessibility and ease of use of
these types of systems is an important factor.

The Cognisco tool has enabled senior Interbrew managers and directors to
focus on their development needs within a well-structured competency framework.
For individuals, this means they are able to focus and target their development
where it really matters.

Promotion policies re-evaluated

Even more radical are the conclusions drawn by Toms after an intriguing
application of Series-300. These conclusions, if they gain widespread acceptance,
are set to overturn at least one long-held irrational HR belief regarding
remuneration negotiations and promotion policies.

Toms’ HR director Alan Best says: "I wanted an objective reply to the
challenge we’ve all heard far too often – "I’ve been here 20 years and I’m
the most experienced one here." Cognisco’s Series-300 demonstrated that,
sadly, this can be one year’s experience simply repeated 20 times!"

Duty of Care

The British Army has expressed an interest in evaluating whether officers
truly understand what is meant by Duty of Care via Series-300 online
assessments. Its concern is that too many court martials are failing because
officers do not sufficiently understand the basis on which a charge can be
brought. According to Cognisco, discussions are under way with two regional
health trusts regarding objective assessment of managers’ understanding of
race, gender and paternity issues.

However, Cognisco is at pains to point out that Series-300 is not a tool for
trapping the unwary. "It is not 1984 revisited. It seeks to identify the
exceptionally competent too," it says. According to Sam Burton, Subaru
UK’s managing director commenting on a successful application of Series-300
across its UK dealer network, "the whole point is not to catch people out,
but to improve skills."

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A glimpse over the HR horizon perhaps?

So are we witnessing the start of an HR revolution where tests decide who
should advance? Will the driving force be proven merit rather than longevity?
The indications are that increasing numbers of HR managers are demanding a
sounder basis for making certain global decisions. Faced with this, Cognisco
Series-300 may be the preferred choice.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Call centre initiative gives staff recognisable qualifications
next post
Britons turn to drink to relieve stress

You may also like

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+