Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Recruitment & retention

Recruitment firms fined millions by OFT for price fixing

by Mike Berry 30 Sep 2009
by Mike Berry 30 Sep 2009

The OFT has fined six recruitment agencies a total of £39.3m for price-fixing and the collective boycott of another company in the supply of candidates to the construction industry.

Two other recruitment agencies involved have been granted immunity from fines in return for exposing the cartel.

The Office of Fair Trading concluded that A Warwick Associates, Beresford Blake Thomas, CDI AndersElite, Eden Brown, Fusion People, Hays Specialist Recruitment, Henry Recruitment and Hill McGlynn & Associates all breached the Competition Act 1998. They were found to have engaged in the following anti-competitive conduct:

  • Collective boycott – an agreement to withdraw from and/or refrain from entering into contracts with an intermediary company, Parc UK, for the supply of candidates to construction companies in the UK
  • Price-fixing – an agreement and/or concerted practice to fix target fee rates for the supply of candidates to intermediaries and certain construction companies in the UK

In 2003, Parc entered the market with a new and innovative business model to act as an intermediary between construction companies and different recruitment agencies for the supply of candidates, which put pressure on the margins of recruitment agencies.

Instead of competing with Parc – and each other – on price and quality, the parties formed a cartel, referred to as the ‘Construction Recruitment Forum’. In this forum, they agreed to boycott Parc and also co-operated to fix the fee rates they would charge to intermediaries, such as Parc, and also certain construction companies.

Beresford Blake Thomas and Hill McGlynn & Associates were granted immunity from fines as they are part of the corporate group which first provided the OFT with evidence of this cartel activity. All parties applied for and were granted leniency, apart from A Warwick Associates which is in liquidation.

The total level of fines before reductions for leniency were taken into account was £173m.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Heather Clayton, OFT senior director, said: “This is a serious breach of competition law and the level of fines reflects this. Cartels such as these can impact on other businesses, in this case construction companies, by distorting competition and driving up staff costs. Ultimately it is the consumer and the wider economy that loses out from such behaviour.”

Personnel Today first reported the OFT investigation in 2006.

Mike Berry

previous post
RMT calls off Victoria line Tube strike
next post
Half of all sickness absences in Europe caused by musculoskeletal disorders

You may also like

How to employ a global workforce from the...

28 Aug 2025

Indeed launches platform aimed at healthcare workers

27 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

Petition calls for rethink on NHS agency staff...

19 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Just a sixth of employers proactively hire ex-offenders

12 Aug 2025

Young people still confident of landing jobs, despite...

12 Aug 2025

Call for more support for young workers, as...

12 Aug 2025

Nurse and midwife ‘graduate guarantee’ launched

11 Aug 2025

Doctors call for training reform to beat burnout

8 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise