Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawCorporate manslaughterLatest News

Report into corporate manslaughter law given cautious welcome

by Michael Millar 21 Dec 2005
by Michael Millar 21 Dec 2005

Employers representatives and unions alike have given a reserved welcome to a new report into the government’s proposed corporate manslaughter legislation.

The Home Affairs Committee called for proposed corporate manslaughter offences to be strengthened, warning that existing government plans may help some large companies to avoid prosecution.

A draft Corporate Manslaughter Bill was published after the General Election in May, in response to a number of high-profile rail crashes, including at Potters Bar and Hatfield. In the first instance, no manslaughter charges were brought, and in the latter, corporate manslaughter charges against Balfour Beatty were dropped.

The Institute of Directors (IoD) welcomed a call for unincorporated bodies to brought within the scope of the proposed new law as well as the removal of Crown immunity for public bodies.

However, the IoD said it had has serious concern that the issue of individual director liability has been raised again.

Patricia Peter, head of corporate governance at the IoD, said: “It has taken many years to reach this point and it would be regrettable, to say the least, if the reopening of this debate were to lead to continued failed prosecutions and failures in the criminal justice system.

A key clause in the government’s proposal, which makes employers liable for worker deaths caused by “senior management”, could lead to a “perverse incentive” for top bosses to delegate key health and safety decisions to more junior staff, the report warned.

It also warned that the law focused on senior management failings rather than individual liability, which would allow top directors to avoid prosecution.

To eliminate such a risk, a new offence of  “secondary liability for corporate manslaughter” should also be introduced, the committee said.

The IoD said the idea of secondary liability might mean directors facing individual liability, which would “fly in the face of encouraging appropriate corporate culture”.

The GMB welcomed the proposal for juries to consider the corporate culture throughout an organisation when looking at serious breaches, claiming the examples shown by directors and employers can have a profound influence on how an organisation conducts itself. 

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The union said secondary liability for corporate manslaughter would lead to organisations and their managers taking their responsibilities more seriously. 

The GMB added that the “senior management” test would be too ill-defined.

Michael Millar

previous post
One in three UK staff fail to take full holiday entitlement
next post
Employment lawyer named as new Commissioner for Public Appointments

You may also like

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

1 Jul 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

Government moves swiftly on immigration reform

1 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Government launches ‘landmark’ review of parental leave

1 Jul 2025

Clarks cuts 1,200 jobs after ‘year of transition’

1 Jul 2025

How HR can support families with adoption

1 Jul 2025

Co-op equal pay claims move onto next stage

30 Jun 2025

‘Be direct’ to avoid escalating conflict, advises Acas

30 Jun 2025

Reforming paternity leave could benefit UK by £13bn...

30 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+